The OKR Software Benchmark · 2026.Q3.2
Best OKR software for mid-market companies in 2026
Scalable tools with the right balance of features and usability
Updated September 13, 2026 · 13 platforms scored · How we rank
Mid-market companies need OKR software that balances ease of use with scalability. Look for tools with strong reporting, good integrations, and pricing that works as you grow from 200 to 2000+ employees.
How we think about this category
Different buyers weigh different things, so every ranking in this benchmark runs its own weighted model instead of reusing one universal score. Here is what we score in this category, heaviest first:
Ease of Use (20%) — Intuitive for managers and contributors.
Scalability (20%) — Supports growth in teams and structure.
OKR Reporting (20%) — Leadership visibility and roll-up clarity.
Integration (15%) — Works with existing operating systems.
Pricing (15%) — Predictable value at scaling headcount.
Features (10%) — Coverage of core OKR workflows.
The full rationale for each criterion is under How we compare.
The ranking
Tability ranks first among 13 scored active platforms, with a 4.3/5 mid-market score, ahead of Perdoo (4.1/5) and Profit.co (3.9/5).
Scored set: Tability, Perdoo, Profit.co, Mooncamp, OKRs Tool, 15Five, Rhythms.ai, WorkBoard, Betterworks, Teamflect, Oboard, JOP, Weekdone.
Outside this assessed set: Atlassian Goals, Cascade, Jira Align, Lattice, Leapsome, Peoplebox, Range. Omission does not imply a missing capability.
- 01
Tability
Top pick4.3/5mid-market scoreTability is a modern goal-tracking platform designed for teams who want to manage OKRs without complexity. It focuses on simplicity, accountability, and actionable insights.
Tested hands-on (Sep 2026) · Premium trial (14 days, no credit card)
“Time for our own medicine. Tability was evaluated in a 30-minute session using the shared scenario, and the first difference showed before any goals existed: plan creation asks about check-in cadence and permissions up front. In several other tested tools those were settings I had to hunt for later – here the plan starts with a weekly reminder rhythm and access rules already decided.”
- Plan creation front-loads the decisions other tools hide – cadence and permissions first, OKRs from text second.
- The key result is the primary object – a full page with a graph, and a check-in built around the comment.
- The dashboards you build by hand elsewhere come out of the box.
The plan editor after import – plan score at 71, and the AI feedback pass finding nothing left to fix The key result page after check-in – the graph at 48 per month, with data connector and agent manager alongside The plan as a dashboard – timeline, key results, initiatives, net confidence score, and Quick AI Mode prompts, none of it built by hand AI in this session: The key-result-scoped AI mode answered a strategy question about the specific key result in view, grounded in its context.
In this category it scores highest on ease of use and OKR reporting (4.5), and lowest on integration (4).
Choose it if you want a modern, clean OKR platform with dashboards ready out of the box, AI working across the product, and goals built for the agentic world — MCP, scheduled reports, and agents you can assign to key results. Skip it if you need a free tier, performance management with deep HRIS integration, or a heavyweight enterprise rollout with dedicated services at very large scale.
$6/user/month · 14-day trial · G2 rating 4.7 (161) · Gartner rating 4.9 (46)
- 024.1/5mid-market score
Perdoo helps organizations implement OKRs and execute their strategy. It offers a balanced feature set for mid-sized to large companies.
Tested hands-on (Sep 2026) · Free trial (no credit card)
“Perdoo gave me the fastest OKR setup of the benchmark so far, and it did it with AI. After a classic onboarding – pick your framework, pick your cadence, a small hiccup with the password email that I won't hold against them – I found a goal importer that takes plain text. I pasted my whole test scenario and it came back parsed: objective, three key results with the right targets, initiative. One go.”
- The AI goal importer is one of the fastest OKR setups in this benchmark – our whole scenario parsed from plain text in one go.
- In-app AI stops at the importer – but ChatGPT and Claude connect to your goals through Perdoo's MCP server.
- The full test structure was live and attached to the sales team within minutes.
The importer parsed the full test scenario from plain text, targets included The integrations catalog – ChatGPT and Claude connect through Perdoo's MCP server, next to an open API The imported structure on the home view, with the weekly Action Center above it In this category it scores highest on OKR reporting and features (4.5), and lowest on integration (3.5).
Choose it if you want structured OKRs with an AI importer that created the scenario quickly — plus MCP access to your goals from ChatGPT and Claude. Skip it if you need a workspace-aware in-app assistant, ready-made leadership dashboards, or enterprise controls like IP restrictions and creation permissions.
$9/user/month · Free tier · G2 rating 4.4 (502)
- 033.9/5mid-market score
Profit.co is a comprehensive OKR platform that combines objectives and key results with performance management. It offers a wide range of features for enterprise teams.
Tested hands-on (Sep 2026) · Free trial (30 days, no credit card)
“Profit.co is the opposite bet to Mooncamp. Where Mooncamp keeps things minimal, Profit.co ships everything – OKRs, performance management, a separate task module, a huge connector catalog – and you feel that breadth from the first minute. Onboarding was slower than the modern tools: account creation, a wait while sample data generated, then email verification before I could start. The workspace arrived with a full set of sample OKRs already in place.”
- Every key result is a KPI you must define first – goal creation is slow and form-heavy.
- Check-ins are the smartest moment in the product – our 48 was flagged At Risk against the plan line automatically.
- Reporting is deep but reads like an advanced spreadsheet – and presentation mode is a download, not a view.
The Add KPI form – name, category, and measurement type before a key result exists The check-in modal – 48 auto-flagged At Risk, 14.3% below the plan value for the date The completed test structure – objective, three KPI-backed key results, and the initiative filed as a non-contributing key result In this category it scores highest on integration (5), and lowest on ease of use (3).
Choose it if you want OKRs, performance management, and tasks in one system, with deep integrations and enterprise controls, and you have the patience to configure it. Skip it if you want a lightweight OKR tool your team can navigate without training, native AI that works out of the box, or transparent pricing.
Est. $9/user/month (est.) · 30-day trial · G2 rating 4.7 (471) · Gartner rating 4.7 (109)
- 043.8/5mid-market score
Mooncamp is a modern, user-friendly OKR platform designed for fast-growing companies. It focuses on simplicity and ease of use while providing powerful OKR management features.
Tested hands-on (Sep 2026) · Free trial (14 days, no credit card)
“Mooncamp gave me one of the smoothest starts in this benchmark. I signed up with an email code, skipped the tour, and landed in a workspace already filled with demo data. My test OKRs – one objective for the sales team, three key results, one initiative – were in within a few minutes.”
- We found no AI surface or MCP connection during this Mooncamp trial; broader availability remains unverified.
- The core OKR workflow is the strongest part of the product.
- Check-ins record the number, a status, and a comment – but the flow is metrics-first.
The completed test structure – objective, three key results, and the initiative The scripted check-in – value updated to 48 per month with the comment in the history Explorer cascade view with team, owner, progress, and status columns In this category it scores highest on ease of use (4.5), and lowest on integration (3).
Choose it if you want clean, manual OKR tracking your team will actually use, and AI isn't part of your goal workflow. Skip it if you need AI assistance, an importer for existing goals, a public API, or leadership-ready reporting.
$8.1/user/month · 14-day trial · G2 rating 4.8 (296) · Gartner rating 4 (2)
- 053.7/5mid-market score
OKRs Tool is a flat-fee OKR platform for teams on a budget, and it is showing promise with updates covering KPIs, reports, built-in AI, and documented connections including Jira and a hosted MCP server. It is still a young product with a small team and only a handful of third-party reviews.
Tested hands-on (Sep 2026) · Free plan (no credit card)
“OKRs Tool starts strong. Right at onboarding it offered to draft my goals with AI, I pasted my test scenario, and the objective and three key results appeared with sensible targets. Then the cracks showed: every start value had been imported as zero, and when I corrected them, my edits saved but the app kept showing the old numbers. One key result ended up reading 100% ahead of pace because of an inverted baseline.”
- AI drafting set up our OKRs in minutes – with the wrong baselines.
- Goal editing fought back – changes saved but didn't show up.
- Check-ins work, but progress is a bar, not a trend.
The AI draft at onboarding – objective and key results parsed, targets suggested The imported goals – every start value arrived as 0, and the corrections wouldn't display The AI Coach insisting the objective has no key results – it had three AI in this session: Asked what to focus on this week, the AI Coach answered that our objective had no key results defined – it had three – and built its recommendations on that wrong premise.
In this category it scores highest on pricing (5), and lowest on ease of use (3).
Choose it if you're a small team on a tight budget — the free tier and flat fee are the cheapest way into OKRs, and you can live with rough edges while the product matures. Skip it if you need a fast, polished product, automatic key result updates from your data sources, or AI you can trust to read your goals correctly.
$49/flat fee · Free tier · G2 rating 4.6 (7)
- 063.6/5mid-market score
15Five is a performance management platform that includes OKR functionality. It combines weekly check-ins, reviews, and objectives for holistic people management.
In this category it scores highest on ease of use (4.5), and lowest on integration (3).
Strengths: Strong performance management features · Weekly check-in system
Watch for: OKRs are secondary to performance management · Limited OKR-specific features
$11/user/month · G2 rating 4.6 (1,804) · Gartner rating 4.4 (25)
- 073.6/5mid-market score
Rhythms.ai is an innovative AI-powered platform that helps teams align strategy with execution. It combines OKRs with AI assistance to help teams set better goals, track progress, and drive accountability.
Tested hands-on (Sep 2026) · Free plan (limited AI credits, no credit card)
“Rhythms.ai drops you straight into a chat window. Signup took seconds, and the first thing the platform wanted was a conversation – so I pasted my test OKRs and said they were for the sales team. The assistant noticed the team didn't exist, asked if it should create it, then built the objective, the key results, and the initiative, checking in with me before publishing. If you use Claude or ChatGPT a lot, this feels immediately familiar. It is also slower than Perdoo's importer, which just went and created everything.”
- Setup is a conversation – the assistant created the team, the OKRs, and the initiative from one pasted message.
- The structure landed correctly and reads well in the alignment tree.
- Check-ins get the details right – manual status, expected-vs-actual, and per-team cadence.
The setup conversation – team created, three key results and the initiative queued up The alignment tree – objective, three key results, and the initiative The check-in – 48 of 60, expected 55.82 shown, status set to Behind manually AI in this session: The setup conversation was an alternative write task – the assistant created the team, objective, key results, and initiative from our pasted scenario, asking before publishing.
In this category it scores highest on scalability and OKR reporting (4), and lowest on pricing (3).
Choose it if you want an AI-native workspace — chat-first setup, auto-updating key results, an MCP server, and a huge connector catalog — and you'll trade some everyday responsiveness for it. Skip it if you want a fast, conventional OKR interface first and AI second, per-person dashboards, or control over who can create content.
Est. $22/user/month (est.) · Free tier
- 083.4/5mid-market score
WorkBoard is an enterprise-grade OKR platform designed for large organizations. It offers comprehensive planning, execution, and analytics capabilities.
In this category it scores highest on scalability (5), and lowest on ease of use (2).
Strengths: Comprehensive enterprise features · Strong analytics
Watch for: Steep learning curve · Expensive solution to deploy
Est. $30/user/month (est.) · G2 rating 4.3 (342) · Gartner rating 4.2 (89)
- 093.3/5mid-market score
Betterworks is a mature enterprise HR platform focused on performance management and continuous conversations. It's focused on employee engagement but also has OKR functionality.
In this category it scores highest on scalability and features (4), and lowest on ease of use (2.5).
Strengths: Performance management capabilities · AI-powered insights for HR
Watch for: OKRs is secondary to performance management · Higher pricing (min. 500 users)
$8/user/month · G2 rating 4.4 (217) · Gartner rating 4.5 (12)
- 103.2/5mid-market score
Teamflect is a comprehensive performance management platform built natively for Microsoft Teams. It combines OKRs, performance reviews, 1-on-1s, and feedback in a single integrated solution.
Tested hands-on (Sep 2026) · Free trial (30 days, via Microsoft sign-in)
“Teamflect pitches itself as the Microsoft Teams OKR app, and the first discovery of the session is that it's really a web app with a Teams extension – the same architecture as Tability's Teams plugin. Signing in with Microsoft still asked me to authenticate again, importing from Excel bounced me out to the web app, and so did the admin center. Inside Teams, the UI is average: compressed, wide, a lot on screen at once. Not the worst I've tested, not close to the most comfortable.”
- The OKR model is light – objectives can be their own metric, and the key result form is titled "Objective".
- Metric types stop at percentage, number, and currency – our hours-based key result lost its unit.
- Check-ins are easy and – rare in this field – you can hold a real conversation on the key result.
Creating a key result in a form titled "Objective title" – metric types stop at percentage, number, and currency The objective with its key results and the lead-routing task attached The key result after check-in – 48 of 60, At Risk, with a live comment thread AI in this session: Ask AI produced a generic summary built on guesses – "it likely focuses on…" with invented suggested outcomes – and then stated it could not find the objective in the current Teamflect goals data. It did not read the metrics, the check-in, or the attached key results.
In this category it scores highest on ease of use (4), and lowest on integration (2).
Choose it if you're Microsoft-heavy and want performance management with light OKRs in one package — reviews, meetings, tasks, recognition, and a free tier for 10 users. Skip it if you want OKRs that scale — progress charts, flexible metrics, grounded AI, per-person views, and data connectors beyond the Microsoft suite.
$7/user/month · Free tier · G2 rating 4.5 (170)
- 113.2/5mid-market score
Oboard is an OKR management platform that integrates directly into Jira and Confluence workflows. It helps teams cascade company objectives and tie them to work items for better alignment.
Tested hands-on (Sep 2026) · Free trial (30 days, Jira Cloud edition)
“Oboard is the OKR layer for teams that refuse to leave Jira, and we tested it exactly there – inside a Jira workspace. Setup started with some confusion about creating a plan for a team, and the objective and key results went in with one recurring annoyance: units. Start, target, or binary types are fine, but the unit field is limited – a five-character cap meant I couldn't express things the way I wanted, and a 12% conversion metric took some bending. Teams attach to items more like tags than structure.”
- Objectives and key results work, but units are the recurring annoyance – capped at five characters.
- The check-in gets the two big things right – manual status with an auto toggle, and comments built for discussion.
- The default dashboard and per-team performance report do the job for a tool this light.
Key result creation – start/target values with the constrained unit field The check-in – 48 of 60 with the auto-versus-manual status toggle open The default dashboard – cycle stats and status counts without any setup In this category it scores highest on ease of use and pricing (3.5), and lowest on features (3).
Choose it if your team lives in Jira, you don't want another platform, and you want simple OKRs with good check-in discussions at a very low per-user price. Skip it if you're scaling OKRs across many teams — automated key results from data sources, team-versus-team views, creation permissions, or AI in the daily workflow.
$2.16/user/month · Free tier · G2 rating 4.6 (16) · Gartner rating 4.2 (29)
- 122.9/5mid-market score
JOP (Joy of Performing) is simple cloud-based performance management and OKR platform. It helps align business strategy to execution and provides insights into business performance.
In this category it scores highest on ease of use (4), and lowest on integration (2).
Strengths: Combines performance management and OKR tracking · Visual goal mapping (Constellations)
Watch for: Not focused on OKR management · Limited integrations and reporting capabilities
Est. $6.5/user/month (est.) · 90-day trial · G2 rating 4.6 (133)
- 132.8/5mid-market score
Weekdone combines weekly planning with OKR tracking. It's designed for teams that want structured check-ins and progress updates.
Tested hands-on (Sep 2026) · Free trial (no credit card)
“Weekdone is the veteran of this benchmark, and it shows. The first thing I noticed after signing up was that the UI looks dated next to everything else I have tested. The bones of a decent product are here – teams in the sidebar, quarterly objectives, KPIs, a presentation mode – but the experience kept reminding me how much the category has moved on.”
- Manual setup works, but the team view buries your OKRs under four other things.
- Weekdone picks your status color for you – and that alone would stop me recommending it for check-ins.
- The tree view shows the result – colors assigned by formula, not by the team.
The sales team page – OKRs, personal OKRs, KPIs, and projects competing for one screen The check-in – value dragged to 48 on a slider, no per-key-result chart to show the trend The tree view after check-in – statuses auto-colored from progress In this category it scores highest on pricing (4), and lowest on integration (2).
Choose it if you're a team of three or fewer learning OKR basics on the free tier, or you want admin control over who can create OKRs in a simple tool. Skip it if you want teams to set their own confidence on check-ins, per-key-result trend charts, AI, or data connectors — the table stakes of the modern field.
$9/user/month · Free tier · G2 rating 4.1 (38)
How to choose in this category
Mid-market companies need OKR software that balances adoption speed with operational maturity. The best choice supports current execution needs while staying reliable as teams, managers, and planning layers increase.
Choose for the next stage of scale, not just current size
Tools that work for a smaller organization can struggle once planning spans multiple departments and leadership layers.
Strong mid-market platforms keep alignment clear as ownership structures and review cadence become more complex.
- Validate objective rollups across at least three departments.
- Test manager workflows for weekly check-ins and quarterly reviews.
- Confirm administrative effort stays manageable as user count grows.
Prioritize reporting reliability for leadership cadence
Mid-market leadership teams depend on concise, comparable reporting to make timely resource decisions.
Choose software where dashboards remain readable and actionable without custom BI work every cycle.
Evaluate integration and pricing together
A lower sticker price can become expensive when teams spend hours manually consolidating updates.
Better choices combine predictable pricing with integrations that reduce weekly reporting overhead.
Use this ranking to shortlist tools that fit both current operations and near-term growth, then run a live pilot across multiple teams before committing to a full rollout.
How we compare
Our scoring focuses specifically on OKR capabilities. If a platform offers OKRs alongside other features (like performance management or project management), we evaluate how well it handles OKRs specifically, not its full feature set.
Ease of Use
20%Mid-market teams often roll out OKRs without a large enablement function, so day-to-day usability is critical.
This criterion favors platforms that let teams plan, check in, and review progress without extensive training overhead.
Scalability
20%As companies move from a few departments to many, goal alignment and ownership become harder to coordinate.
We reward tools that handle additional hierarchy and process complexity without creating heavy admin burden.
OKR Reporting
20%Mid-market leaders need fast, trustworthy reporting to manage multiple teams and competing priorities.
Higher scores reflect dashboards and rollups that are clear enough for recurring executive reviews.
Integration
15%Integration depth matters more as organizations standardize workflows across task, communication, and data tools.
This criterion prioritizes platforms that reduce manual updates and improve cross-system consistency.
Pricing
15%Mid-market buyers need pricing that remains manageable as seat counts and process maturity increase.
We evaluate value in the context of both licensing cost and ongoing operating effort.
Features
10%Teams still need strong planning, ownership, and accountability workflows as complexity grows.
This criterion rewards products with complete core features that support disciplined execution.
Scores in detail
| Platform | mid-market score | Ease of Use | Scalability | OKR Reporting | Integration | Pricing | Features | Pricing |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Top pickTability | 4.3 | 4.5 | 4 | 4.5 | 4 | 4.5 | 4.5 | $6/user/month |
Perdoo | 4.1 | 4 | 4 | 4.5 | 3.5 | 4 | 4.5 | $9/user/month |
Profit.co | 3.9 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 3.5 | 4 | Est. $9/user/month |
Mooncamp | 3.8 | 4.5 | 3.5 | 3.5 | 3 | 4 | 4 | $8.1/user/month |
OKRs Tool | 3.7 | 3 | 3.5 | 3.5 | 4 | 5 | 3.5 | $49/flat fee |
15Five | 3.6 | 4.5 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 3.5 | 3.5 | $11/user/month |
Rhythms.ai | 3.6 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 3.5 | Est. $22/user/month |
WorkBoard | 3.4 | 2 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 2.5 | 4.5 | Est. $30/user/month |
Betterworks | 3.3 | 2.5 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 3.5 | 4 | $8/user/month |
Teamflect | 3.2 | 4 | 3.5 | 3 | 2 | 3.5 | 3 | $7/user/month |
Oboard | 3.2 | 3.5 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3.5 | 3 | $2.16/user/month |
JOP | 2.9 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 3.5 | 3 | Est. $6.5/user/month |
Weekdone | 2.8 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 3 | $9/user/month |
Download the data behind this comparison — versioned JSON/CSV, free to reuse with attribution.
Frequently asked questions
What is the best OKR software for mid-market?
Tability ranks first among 13 scored active platforms, with a 4.3/5 mid-market score, ahead of Perdoo (4.1/5) and Profit.co (3.9/5).
How are tools ranked in the Best OKR software for mid-market comparison?
We weight criteria specific to this use case, with the strongest emphasis on Ease of Use (20%) and Scalability (20%), then calculate the separately labeled mid-market score out of 5. The full scoring model and weights are published on our methodology page.
How many OKR tools for mid-market publish their pricing?
9 of the 13 actively maintained platforms in this comparison publish pricing publicly. The median public starting price is $8.05/user/month. Prices distinguish vendor-listed amounts, third-party estimates and quote-only products. Dates refer to individual recorded checks; this pass did not recheck prices.
Last updated September 13, 2026 · release 2026.Q3.2
Tability ranks first among 13 scored active platforms, with a 4.3/5 mid-market score, ahead of Perdoo (4.1/5) and Profit.co (3.9/5).