Best OKR software overall in 2026

One shared score across the benchmark, with published weights and active-vendor coverage

Tability is the best OKR software overall in 2026, scoring 4.5/5 across our seven weighted criteria — and yes, we make it, so every weight and score behind that rank is published for you to check. WorkBoard (4.0) is the pick when strategy execution needs enterprise discipline, and Perdoo (4.0) when you want transparent pricing with a free plan. The ranking below covers 23 active platforms – twelve tested hands-on, the rest scored from documentation – and the categories we lose are on the record.

The hands-on sessions behind this ranking, in five minutes.

The ranking

Scored set: Tability, WorkBoard, Perdoo, Profit.co, Peoplebox, Rhythms.ai, Mooncamp, Workpath, Oboard, Teamflect, 15Five, Cascade, ClearPoint Strategy, OKRs Tool, Lattice, JOP, Betterworks, Weekdone, Envisio, Atlassian Goals, Jira Align, Leapsome, Range.

  1. 01
    Tability logo

    Tability

    Top pick
    4.5/5
    Overall benchmark score

    In this category it scores highest on ease of use and features (5), and lowest on reporting (4). Tability is a modern goal-tracking platform designed for teams who want to manage OKRs without complexity. It focuses on simplicity, accountability, and actionable insights.

    We tested it hands-on in September 2026 on the premium trial (14 days, no credit card). “Time for our own medicine. Tability was evaluated in a 30-minute session using the shared scenario, and the first difference showed before any goals existed: plan creation asks about check-in cadence and permissions up front. In several other tested tools those were settings I had to hunt for later – here the plan starts with a weekly reminder rhythm and access rules already decided.”

    • Plan creation front-loads the decisions other tools hide – cadence and permissions first, OKRs from text second.
    • The key result is the primary object – a full page with a graph, and a check-in built around the comment.
    • The dashboards you build by hand elsewhere come out of the box.
    • AI in this session: The key-result-scoped AI mode answered a strategy question about the specific key result in view, grounded in its context.
    The plan editor after import – plan score at 71, and the AI feedback pass finding nothing left to fix
    The key result page after check-in – the graph at 48 per month, with data connector and agent manager alongside
    The plan as a dashboard – timeline, key results, initiatives, net confidence score, and Quick AI Mode prompts, none of it built by hand

    Choose it if you want a modern, clean OKR platform with dashboards ready out of the box, AI working across the product, and goals built for the agentic world — MCP, scheduled reports, and agents you can assign to key results. Skip it if you need a free tier, performance management with deep HRIS integration, or a heavyweight enterprise rollout with dedicated services at very large scale.

    $6/user/month · 14-day trial · G2 rating 4.7 (161) · Gartner rating 4.9 (46)

    Full review →Visit site ↗

  2. 02
    4.0/5
    Overall benchmark score

    In this category it scores highest on AI features (5), and lowest on pricing transparency (0). WorkBoard is an enterprise-grade OKR platform designed for large organizations. It offers comprehensive planning, execution, and analytics capabilities.

    Homepage
    OKR product page

    The case for it: Comprehensive enterprise features · Strong analytics. The catch: Steep learning curve · Expensive solution to deploy.

    Est. $30/user/month (est.) · G2 rating 4.3 (342) · Gartner rating 4.2 (89)

    Full review →AlternativesVisit site ↗

  3. 03
    4.0/5
    Overall benchmark score

    In this category it scores highest on pricing transparency (5), and lowest on AI features (2.5). Perdoo helps organizations implement OKRs and execute their strategy. It offers a balanced feature set for mid-sized to large companies.

    We tested it hands-on in September 2026 on the free trial (no credit card). “Perdoo gave me the fastest OKR setup of the benchmark so far, and it did it with AI. After a classic onboarding – pick your framework, pick your cadence, a small hiccup with the password email that I won't hold against them – I found a goal importer that takes plain text. I pasted my whole test scenario and it came back parsed: objective, three key results with the right targets, initiative. One go.”

    • The AI goal importer is one of the fastest OKR setups in this benchmark – our whole scenario parsed from plain text in one go.
    • In-app AI stops at the importer – but ChatGPT and Claude connect to your goals through Perdoo's MCP server.
    • The full test structure was live and attached to the sales team within minutes.
    The importer parsed the full test scenario from plain text, targets included
    The integrations catalog – ChatGPT and Claude connect through Perdoo's MCP server, next to an open API
    The imported structure on the home view, with the weekly Action Center above it

    Choose it if you want structured OKRs with an AI importer that created the scenario quickly — plus MCP access to your goals from ChatGPT and Claude. Skip it if you need a workspace-aware in-app assistant, ready-made leadership dashboards, or enterprise controls like IP restrictions and creation permissions.

    $9/user/month · Free tier · G2 rating 4.4 (502)

    Full review →AlternativesVisit site ↗

  4. 04
    3.5/5
    Overall benchmark score

    In this category it scores highest on integrations (5), and lowest on pricing transparency (1). Profit.co is a comprehensive OKR platform that combines objectives and key results with performance management. It offers a wide range of features for enterprise teams.

    We tested it hands-on in September 2026 on the free trial (30 days, no credit card). “Profit.co is the opposite bet to Mooncamp. Where Mooncamp keeps things minimal, Profit.co ships everything – OKRs, performance management, a separate task module, a huge connector catalog – and you feel that breadth from the first minute. Onboarding was slower than the modern tools: account creation, a wait while sample data generated, then email verification before I could start. The workspace arrived with a full set of sample OKRs already in place.”

    • Every key result is a KPI you must define first – goal creation is slow and form-heavy.
    • Check-ins are the smartest moment in the product – our 48 was flagged At Risk against the plan line automatically.
    • Reporting is deep but reads like an advanced spreadsheet – and presentation mode is a download, not a view.
    The Add KPI form – name, category, and measurement type before a key result exists
    The check-in modal – 48 auto-flagged At Risk, 14.3% below the plan value for the date
    The completed test structure – objective, three KPI-backed key results, and the initiative filed as a non-contributing key result

    Choose it if you want OKRs, performance management, and tasks in one system, with deep integrations and enterprise controls, and you have the patience to configure it. Skip it if you want a lightweight OKR tool your team can navigate without training, native AI that works out of the box, or transparent pricing.

    Est. $9/user/month (est.) · 30-day trial · G2 rating 4.7 (471) · Gartner rating 4.7 (109)

    Full review →Visit site ↗

  5. 05
    3.3/5
    Overall benchmark score

    In this category it scores highest on reporting (4.25), and lowest on pricing transparency (1). Peoplebox is an OKR platform focused on goal alignment, business reviews, and execution. It is positioned for teams that want OKRs tied to operating cadence and leadership visibility.

    Homepage
    OKR product page

    The case for it: Purpose-built OKR workflows with strong alignment features · Good leadership reporting and review cadence support. The catch: Public pricing details are limited · Enterprise configuration can take time.

    $8/user/month · G2 rating 4.5 (365) · Gartner rating 4.4 (8)

    Full review →Visit site ↗

  6. 05
    3.3/5
    Overall benchmark score

    In this category it scores highest on integrations and reporting (4), and lowest on pricing transparency (1). Rhythms.ai is an innovative AI-powered platform that helps teams align strategy with execution. It combines OKRs with AI assistance to help teams set better goals, track progress, and drive accountability.

    We tested it hands-on in September 2026 on the free plan (limited AI credits, no credit card). “Rhythms.ai drops you straight into a chat window. Signup took seconds, and the first thing the platform wanted was a conversation – so I pasted my test OKRs and said they were for the sales team. The assistant noticed the team didn't exist, asked if it should create it, then built the objective, the key results, and the initiative, checking in with me before publishing. If you use Claude or ChatGPT a lot, this feels immediately familiar. It is also slower than Perdoo's importer, which just went and created everything.”

    • Setup is a conversation – the assistant created the team, the OKRs, and the initiative from one pasted message.
    • The structure landed correctly and reads well in the alignment tree.
    • Check-ins get the details right – manual status, expected-vs-actual, and per-team cadence.
    • AI in this session: The setup conversation was an alternative write task – the assistant created the team, objective, key results, and initiative from our pasted scenario, asking before publishing.
    The setup conversation – team created, three key results and the initiative queued up
    The alignment tree – objective, three key results, and the initiative
    The check-in – 48 of 60, expected 55.82 shown, status set to Behind manually

    Choose it if you want an AI-native workspace — chat-first setup, auto-updating key results, an MCP server, and a huge connector catalog — and you'll trade some everyday responsiveness for it. Skip it if you want a fast, conventional OKR interface first and AI second, per-person dashboards, or control over who can create content.

    Est. $22/user/month (est.) · Free tier

    Full review →Visit site ↗

  7. 07
    3.3/5
    Overall benchmark score

    In this category it scores highest on ease of use and pricing transparency (5), and lowest on AI features (0). Mooncamp is a modern, user-friendly OKR platform designed for fast-growing companies. It focuses on simplicity and ease of use while providing powerful OKR management features.

    We tested it hands-on in September 2026 on the free trial (14 days, no credit card). “Mooncamp gave me one of the smoothest starts in this benchmark. I signed up with an email code, skipped the tour, and landed in a workspace already filled with demo data. My test OKRs – one objective for the sales team, three key results, one initiative – were in within a few minutes.”

    • We found no AI surface or MCP connection during this Mooncamp trial; broader availability remains unverified.
    • The core OKR workflow is the strongest part of the product.
    • Check-ins record the number, a status, and a comment – but the flow is metrics-first.
    The completed test structure – objective, three key results, and the initiative
    The scripted check-in – value updated to 48 per month with the comment in the history
    Explorer cascade view with team, owner, progress, and status columns

    Choose it if you want clean, manual OKR tracking your team will actually use, and AI isn't part of your goal workflow. Skip it if you need AI assistance, an importer for existing goals, a public API, or leadership-ready reporting.

    $8.1/user/month · 14-day trial · G2 rating 4.8 (296) · Gartner rating 4 (2)

    Full review →AlternativesVisit site ↗

  8. 08
    3.1/5
    Overall benchmark score

    In this category it scores highest on reporting (4), and lowest on pricing transparency (1). Workpath is a strategy execution platform for large European enterprises, with Siemens Energy, Bayer and Philips among the logos on its site. KPIs come first in the product story and OKRs second, and the only trial comes after a demo — so this profile and its scores are documentation-based, not hands-on.

    The case for it: KPIs, goals and initiatives in one platform · Deep Microsoft integration: Teams, Power BI, Planner, Azure DevOps and Entra ID. The catch: The interface looks dated and form-heavy in the public material we could find · The website keeps the product out of sight – real screens only surface in help articles and videos.

    Choose it if you're a large European enterprise on the Microsoft stack that manages by KPIs first and wants consulting alongside the software. Skip it if you want a modern, lightweight OKR tool, or a trial before a sales call.

    Pricing not public

    Full review →Visit site ↗

  9. 09
    3.1/5
    Overall benchmark score

    In this category it scores highest on task support (4.5), and lowest on AI features (0). Oboard is an OKR management platform that integrates directly into Jira and Confluence workflows. It helps teams cascade company objectives and tie them to work items for better alignment.

    We tested it hands-on in September 2026 on the free trial (30 days, Jira Cloud edition). “Oboard is the OKR layer for teams that refuse to leave Jira, and we tested it exactly there – inside a Jira workspace. Setup started with some confusion about creating a plan for a team, and the objective and key results went in with one recurring annoyance: units. Start, target, or binary types are fine, but the unit field is limited – a five-character cap meant I couldn't express things the way I wanted, and a 12% conversion metric took some bending. Teams attach to items more like tags than structure.”

    • Objectives and key results work, but units are the recurring annoyance – capped at five characters.
    • The check-in gets the two big things right – manual status with an auto toggle, and comments built for discussion.
    • The default dashboard and per-team performance report do the job for a tool this light.
    Key result creation – start/target values with the constrained unit field
    The check-in – 48 of 60 with the auto-versus-manual status toggle open
    The default dashboard – cycle stats and status counts without any setup

    Choose it if your team lives in Jira, you don't want another platform, and you want simple OKRs with good check-in discussions at a very low per-user price. Skip it if you're scaling OKRs across many teams — automated key results from data sources, team-versus-team views, creation permissions, or AI in the daily workflow.

    $2.16/user/month · Free tier · G2 rating 4.6 (16) · Gartner rating 4.2 (29)

    Full review →Visit site ↗

  10. 09
    3.1/5
    Overall benchmark score

    In this category it scores highest on pricing transparency (5), and lowest on AI features (2). Teamflect is a comprehensive performance management platform built natively for Microsoft Teams. It combines OKRs, performance reviews, 1-on-1s, and feedback in a single integrated solution.

    We tested it hands-on in September 2026 on the free trial (30 days, via Microsoft sign-in). “Teamflect pitches itself as the Microsoft Teams OKR app, and the first discovery of the session is that it's really a web app with a Teams extension – the same architecture as Tability's Teams plugin. Signing in with Microsoft still asked me to authenticate again, importing from Excel bounced me out to the web app, and so did the admin center. Inside Teams, the UI is average: compressed, wide, a lot on screen at once. Not the worst I've tested, not close to the most comfortable.”

    • The OKR model is light – objectives can be their own metric, and the key result form is titled "Objective".
    • Metric types stop at percentage, number, and currency – our hours-based key result lost its unit.
    • Check-ins are easy and – rare in this field – you can hold a real conversation on the key result.
    • AI in this session: Ask AI produced a generic summary built on guesses – "it likely focuses on…" with invented suggested outcomes – and then stated it could not find the objective in the current Teamflect goals data. It did not read the metrics, the check-in, or the attached key results.
    Creating a key result in a form titled "Objective title" – metric types stop at percentage, number, and currency
    The objective with its key results and the lead-routing task attached
    The key result after check-in – 48 of 60, At Risk, with a live comment thread

    Choose it if you're Microsoft-heavy and want performance management with light OKRs in one package — reviews, meetings, tasks, recognition, and a free tier for 10 users. Skip it if you want OKRs that scale — progress charts, flexible metrics, grounded AI, per-person views, and data connectors beyond the Microsoft suite.

    $7/user/month · Free tier · G2 rating 4.5 (170)

    Full review →Visit site ↗

  11. 11
    3.1/5
    Overall benchmark score

    In this category it scores highest on pricing transparency (5), and lowest on AI features (2). 15Five is a performance management platform that includes OKR functionality. It combines weekly check-ins, reviews, and objectives for holistic people management.

    Homepage
    OKR product page

    The case for it: Strong performance management features · Weekly check-in system. The catch: OKRs are secondary to performance management · Limited OKR-specific features.

    $11/user/month · G2 rating 4.6 (1,804) · Gartner rating 4.4 (25)

    Full review →Visit site ↗

  12. 11
    3.1/5
    Overall benchmark score

    In this category it scores highest on integrations and reporting (4), and lowest on pricing transparency (1). Cascade is a strategy execution platform that combines planning, OKRs, metrics, and initiative tracking in a single workspace. It is designed for organizations that need clear visibility from company strategy down to team-level execution and accountability.

    We tested it hands-on in September 2026 on the free trial (no credit card). “Cascade organizes work into plans and teams – a structure that felt familiar from Tability – and my Sales OKRs plan existed within a minute. Then the OKR model and I started negotiating. Cascade doesn't really have objectives and key results: it has focus areas, objectives, and then a choice between measures, projects, and actions. Getting my three key results in meant creating each one as a measure through a Profit.co-style form – define the metric, the target, the expected progress – which works, but is slow, and the terminology never quite fits OKRs.”

    • Cascade doesn't natively follow the OKR model – key results become "measures" behind a KPI-style form.
    • The update form gives comments real space – but Cascade picks your confidence for you.
    • The AI-generated executive review is the best thing in the product.
    • AI in this session: The executive quarterly review generator produced an AI-written overview of the plan that correctly identified the stalled measures, quantified the gap against expected progress, and recommended a conversation with the goal owner.
    The Add Measure form – tracking, success definition, and expected progress for what OKR teams would call a key result
    The update panel – At Risk assigned automatically, with no confidence control for the owner
    The generated executive quarterly review – AI-written analysis over live plan data

    Choose it if you're a numbers-driven, strategy-execution organization that reports to executives quarterly — the AI-generated QBR and MBR reports are genuinely good. Skip it if your OKR practice runs on team judgment and conversation — owner-set confidence, comment threads on updates, and a weekly check-in rhythm aren't Cascade's model.

    Est. $29/user/month (est.) · Free tier · G2 rating 4.8 (235) · Gartner rating 4.4 (14)

    Full review →Visit site ↗

  13. 11
    3.1/5
    Overall benchmark score

    In this category it scores highest on reporting (4.5), and lowest on pricing transparency (1). ClearPoint Strategy is strategy reporting software built around scorecards, dashboards and reporting workflows, with OKRs listed as one planning option among several. There is no trial, only an interactive tour, so this profile and its scores are documentation-based, not hands-on.

    The case for it: The product is visible on the website, dashboards included · Reporting workflows with reminders, approvals and scheduled briefing books in PDF, PowerPoint or Excel. The catch: Reporting-first – nothing in the public material shows a team discussing a goal · Dashboards and reports look like something you build, not something that comes with the plan.

    Choose it if you're a strategy or performance office that produces scorecards and board reports for a public agency, utility, hospital or bank. Skip it if you want a place where teams discuss goals every week.

    Pricing not public

    Full review →Visit site ↗

  14. 14
    3.0/5
    Overall benchmark score

    In this category it scores highest on pricing transparency (5), and lowest on integrations (2). OKRs Tool is a flat-fee OKR platform for teams on a budget, and it is showing promise with updates covering KPIs, reports, built-in AI, and documented connections including Jira and a hosted MCP server. It is still a young product with a small team and only a handful of third-party reviews.

    We tested it hands-on in September 2026 on the free plan (no credit card). “OKRs Tool starts strong. Right at onboarding it offered to draft my goals with AI, I pasted my test scenario, and the objective and three key results appeared with sensible targets. Then the cracks showed: every start value had been imported as zero, and when I corrected them, my edits saved but the app kept showing the old numbers. One key result ended up reading 100% ahead of pace because of an inverted baseline.”

    • AI drafting set up our OKRs in minutes – with the wrong baselines.
    • Goal editing fought back – changes saved but didn't show up.
    • Check-ins work, but progress is a bar, not a trend.
    • AI in this session: Asked what to focus on this week, the AI Coach answered that our objective had no key results defined – it had three – and built its recommendations on that wrong premise.
    The AI draft at onboarding – objective and key results parsed, targets suggested
    The imported goals – every start value arrived as 0, and the corrections wouldn't display
    The AI Coach insisting the objective has no key results – it had three

    Choose it if you're a small team on a tight budget — the free tier and flat fee are the cheapest way into OKRs, and you can live with rough edges while the product matures. Skip it if you need a fast, polished product, automatic key result updates from your data sources, or AI you can trust to read your goals correctly.

    $49/flat fee · Free tier · G2 rating 4.6 (7)

    Full review →Visit site ↗

  15. 15
    2.8/5
    Overall benchmark score

    In this category it scores highest on pricing transparency (5), and lowest on AI features (0). Lattice combines performance management with goal setting and OKR tracking, giving people teams a unified system for alignment and development.

    Homepage
    OKR product page

    The case for it: Unified goals and performance management workflows · Clear OKR and goal tracking for people teams. The catch: OKR depth is secondary to performance management · Limited task and project execution workflows.

    $8/user/month · G2 rating 4.7 (4,060) · Gartner rating 4.4 (61)

    Full review →AlternativesVisit site ↗

  16. 16
    2.8/5
    Overall benchmark score

    In this category it scores highest on pricing transparency (5), and lowest on AI features (1). JOP (Joy of Performing) is simple cloud-based performance management and OKR platform. It helps align business strategy to execution and provides insights into business performance.

    Homepage
    OKR product page

    The case for it: Combines performance management and OKR tracking · Visual goal mapping (Constellations). The catch: Not focused on OKR management · Limited integrations and reporting capabilities.

    Est. $6.5/user/month (est.) · 90-day trial · G2 rating 4.6 (133)

    Full review →Visit site ↗

  17. 17
    2.6/5
    Overall benchmark score

    In this category it scores highest on features and integrations (3), and lowest on pricing transparency (1). Betterworks is a mature enterprise HR platform focused on performance management and continuous conversations. It's focused on employee engagement but also has OKR functionality.

    Homepage
    OKR product page

    The case for it: Performance management capabilities · AI-powered insights for HR. The catch: OKRs is secondary to performance management · Higher pricing (min. 500 users).

    $8/user/month · G2 rating 4.4 (269) · Gartner rating 4.5 (12)

    Full review →AlternativesVisit site ↗

  18. 18
    2.5/5
    Overall benchmark score

    In this category it scores highest on pricing transparency (5), and lowest on AI features (0). Weekdone combines weekly planning with OKR tracking. It's designed for teams that want structured check-ins and progress updates.

    We tested it hands-on in September 2026 on the free trial (no credit card). “Weekdone is the veteran of this benchmark, and it shows. The first thing I noticed after signing up was that the UI looks dated next to everything else I have tested. The bones of a decent product are here – teams in the sidebar, quarterly objectives, KPIs, a presentation mode – but the experience kept reminding me how much the category has moved on.”

    • Manual setup works, but the team view buries your OKRs under four other things.
    • Weekdone picks your status color for you – and that alone would stop me recommending it for check-ins.
    • The tree view shows the result – colors assigned by formula, not by the team.
    The sales team page – OKRs, personal OKRs, KPIs, and projects competing for one screen
    The check-in – value dragged to 48 on a slider, no per-key-result chart to show the trend
    The tree view after check-in – statuses auto-colored from progress

    Choose it if you're a team of three or fewer learning OKR basics on the free tier, or you want admin control over who can create OKRs in a simple tool. Skip it if you want teams to set their own confidence on check-ins, per-key-result trend charts, AI, or data connectors — the table stakes of the modern field.

    $9/user/month · Free tier · G2 rating 4.1 (38)

    Full review →AlternativesVisit site ↗

  19. 19
    2.4/5
    Overall benchmark score

    In this category it scores highest on reporting (4), and lowest on pricing transparency (1). Envisio is strategic planning and performance software built exclusively for government, education, healthcare and nonprofit organisations. It is not an OKR product — its site does not mention OKRs — and it offers no trial, so this profile and its scores are documentation-based, not hands-on.

    The case for it: Built for public-sector reporting, with public dashboards and design support included · Budget data from Questica pulled into plans and reports. The catch: No OKRs, confidence ratings or weekly check-ins in anything we could find · A form-heavy interface in the style of Microsoft Project or SharePoint.

    Choose it if you're a public agency such as a council, university or health service that publishes progress on a multi-year strategic plan and ties it to budgets. Skip it if you're a private company, or you're looking for OKRs specifically.

    Pricing not public

    Full review →Visit site ↗

  20. 20
    2.4/5
    Overall benchmark score

    In this category it scores highest on pricing transparency (4), and lowest on reporting (2). Atlassian Goals is the goals platform app included with every Atlassian cloud plan. It tracks objectives and success measures across Jira and Confluence, aimed at lightweight goal visibility rather than a full OKR practice.

    We tested it hands-on in September 2026 on the included with an Atlassian cloud workspace (Goals platform app). “Atlassian Goals is the goals layer that ships free inside every Atlassian cloud plan, and the question going in was simple: does being inside Jira make it a serious OKR tool? The goal directory got me started, a goal maps to the objective, and success measures map to key results. Then came a familiar friction: like Profit.co and Cascade, every metric is created through its own separate form – pick the type, set the values, set a target date for each measure by hand, when it could simply default to the parent goal's timeline. It was annoying enough that I skipped setting the conversion metric up properly.”

    • Goals map to objectives and success measures to key results – each metric built in its own separate form.
    • For a tool inside Jira, connecting work to goals is oddly manual – create the ticket first, then paste its URL.
    • Updates work on the second try – manual status, a note, and a real discussion thread underneath.
    • AI in this session: Rovo located the goal and reported its owner, status, target date, and creation date correctly, describing the record's actual state at query time rather than inventing results.
    The goal with its success measures – each one created through a separate form
    The objective page – success measures as cards, with Jira, Projects, Learnings, Risks, and Decisions tabs
    The update – 40 to 48, Pending to At Risk, with the note and discussion thread

    Choose it if you want free, lightweight goal visibility inside the Atlassian tools your teams already use, with Rovo able to answer questions about your goals. Skip it if you're serious about OKRs — automated key results, maps, generated reports, reminders, and a setup flow that doesn't fight you.

    Free/user/month · Free tier

    Full review →Visit site ↗

  21. 20
    2.4/5
    Overall benchmark score

    In this category it scores highest on features and task support (3), and lowest on AI features (0). Jira Align helps large organizations connect strategy to execution with enterprise planning, portfolio visibility, and OKR-focused strategy management.

    Homepage

    The case for it: Enterprise strategy visibility across portfolios and teams · Strategy room with OKR views like heatmaps and trees. The catch: Expensive and enterprise-oriented pricing · Complex setup and ongoing administration for smaller teams.

    Est. $129/user/month (est.) · Gartner rating 4.4 (92)

    Full review →AlternativesVisit site ↗

  22. 20
    2.4/5
    Overall benchmark score

    In this category it scores highest on ease of use and integrations (3), and lowest on pricing transparency (1). Leapsome is a people enablement platform that includes goals and OKRs alongside performance, engagement, and learning workflows. It is often used by HR-led teams that want goals connected to broader people programs.

    Homepage
    OKR product page

    The case for it: Strong all-in-one people suite with integrated goals · Modern UX and flexible workflows. The catch: Not a pure-play OKR product · Pricing is not fully transparent.

    Est. $11/user/month (est.) · 14-day trial · G2 rating 4.8 (2,296)

    Full review →Visit site ↗

  23. 23
    2.1/5
    Overall benchmark score

    In this category it scores highest on pricing transparency (5), and lowest on AI features (0). Range is a team coordination tool built around async check-ins, meetings, and mood sharing, with a lightweight goals feature attached. It is not structured around the OKR model.

    We tested it hands-on in September 2026 on the pro trial (14 days, no credit card). “Range makes a great first impression. The UI is genuinely clean – up there with Tability and Mooncamp, the best-designed tools I have tested – and finding the goals section took seconds. Then I tried to enter my OKRs, and the evaluation was effectively over in ten minutes.”

    • Range's goals don't follow the OKR model – no key results, and no metric at creation.
    • Every metric starts at zero – we could not express "from 40 to 60".
    • Updates record a value, a status, and a note – but there's no progress chart and no way to comment on an update.
    Creating a goal – title, hashtag, and owner, with no metric anywhere
    The status update dialog – the metric reads 0 of 60, with no way to start from 40
    The goal after our update – At Risk at 48 of 60, note recorded, and no chart in sight

    Choose it if you want a clean tool for async team check-ins, mood, and meetings, with lightweight goals attached — and you're not running a real OKR program. Skip it if you need actual OKRs — baselines, key results, progress charts, data connectors, or AI. Range's goal model can't express "from 40 to 60".

    $8/user/month · Free tier

    Full review →Visit site ↗

How we score this category

Every ranking in this benchmark runs its own weighted model instead of reusing one universal score. The ranking above weighs, heaviest first:

Features
26.67%

Relative weight 2 of 7.5 in the overall benchmark score.

Reporting
26.67%

Relative weight 2 of 7.5 in the overall benchmark score.

Ease of use
13.33%

Relative weight 1 of 7.5 in the overall benchmark score.

Integrations
13.33%

Relative weight 1 of 7.5 in the overall benchmark score.

Task support
6.67%

Relative weight 0.5 of 7.5 in the overall benchmark score.

AI features
6.67%

Relative weight 0.5 of 7.5 in the overall benchmark score.

Pricing transparency
6.67%

Relative weight 0.5 of 7.5 in the overall benchmark score.

The full rationale for each criterion is under How we compare.

How to choose in this category

Use this ranking as a general shortlist under the published weights. Category rankings answer narrower questions and can produce different outcomes.

How to read the overall score

Features and Reporting have relative weight 2; Ease of use and Integrations have weight 1; Task support, AI features and Pricing transparency have weight 0.5. The weighted total is divided by 7.5.

The AI-category review uses its own six dimensions and evidence records. It does not revise the numeric platform ratings used here. Review the separate AI assessment when that capability matters to your decision.

How we compare

Our scoring focuses specifically on OKR capabilities. If a platform offers OKRs alongside other features (like performance management or project management), we evaluate how well it handles OKRs specifically, not its full feature set.

Ease of use

13.33%

Relative weight 1 of 7.5 in the overall benchmark score.

Features

26.67%

Relative weight 2 of 7.5 in the overall benchmark score.

Task support

6.67%

Relative weight 0.5 of 7.5 in the overall benchmark score.

Integrations

13.33%

Relative weight 1 of 7.5 in the overall benchmark score.

Reporting

26.67%

Relative weight 2 of 7.5 in the overall benchmark score.

AI features

6.67%

Relative weight 0.5 of 7.5 in the overall benchmark score.

Pricing transparency

6.67%

Relative weight 0.5 of 7.5 in the overall benchmark score.

Scores in detail

PlatformOverall benchmark scoreEase of useFeaturesTask supportIntegrationsReportingAI featuresPricing transparencyPricing
Top pickTability
4.5
5
5
4
4
4
5
5
$6/user/month
WorkBoard
4.0
3.5
4.5
3.5
4.5
4.5
5
0
Est. $30/user/month
Perdoo
4.0
4
4.5
3.5
4.5
3.5
2.5
5
$9/user/month
Profit.co
3.5
3
4
3
5
3.5
2
1
Est. $9/user/month
Peoplebox
3.3
3.5
3
2
3.5
4.25
4
1
$8/user/month
Rhythms.ai
3.3
3
3
3
4
4
4
1
Est. $22/user/month
Mooncamp
3.3
5
4
2
2
3
0
5
$8.1/user/month
Workpath
3.1
2.5
3
3
3.5
4
3
1
Pricing not public
Oboard
3.1
3.5
3
4.5
2.5
3.5
0
4
$2.16/user/month
Teamflect
3.1
3
3
4.5
2.5
3
2
5
$7/user/month
15Five
3.1
3
2
3
3
4
2
5
$11/user/month
Cascade
3.1
3
2.5
3
4
4
2
1
Est. $29/user/month
ClearPoint Strategy
3.1
2.5
2
3
4
4.5
3
1
Pricing not public
OKRs Tool
3.0
3
3
3
2
3
3
5
$49/flat fee
Lattice
2.8
3
3
3.5
2
3
0
5
$8/user/month
JOP
2.8
2
3
3.5
2
3
1
5
Est. $6.5/user/month
Betterworks
2.6
2
3
2
3
3
2
1
$8/user/month
Weekdone
2.5
2.5
2.5
3
2
2.5
0
5
$9/user/month
Envisio
2.4
2.5
1.5
2.5
2.5
4
1
1
Pricing not public
Atlassian Goals
2.4
2.5
2
3
2.5
2
3
4
Free/user/month
Jira Align
2.4
2
3
3
2
3
0
1
Est. $129/user/month
Leapsome
2.4
3
2
1
3
3
2
1
Est. $11/user/month
Range
2.1
3.5
1.5
2
2
2
0
5
$8/user/month

Download the data behind this comparison — versioned JSON/CSV, free to reuse with attribution.

Frequently asked questions

What is the best OKR software overall?

Tability ranks first among 23 scored active platforms, with a 4.5/5 overall benchmark score, ahead of WorkBoard (4.0/5) and Perdoo (4.0/5).

How are tools ranked in the Best OKR software overall comparison?

We weight criteria specific to this use case, with the strongest emphasis on Features (26.67%) and Reporting (26.67%), then calculate the separately labeled Overall benchmark score out of 5. The full scoring model and weights are published on our methodology page.

How many OKR tools overall publish their pricing?

13 of the 23 actively maintained platforms in this comparison publish pricing publicly. The median public starting price is $8/user/month. Prices distinguish vendor-listed amounts, third-party estimates and quote-only products. Dates refer to individual recorded checks; this pass did not recheck prices.

Last updated September 15, 2026 · release 2026.Q3.2

Tability ranks first among 23 scored active platforms, with a 4.5/5 overall benchmark score, ahead of WorkBoard (4.0/5) and Perdoo (4.0/5).

The OKR software buyer report

Take the benchmark with you

The full market briefing as a PDF — rankings, pricing, AI results, and readiness matrices — plus the complete dataset as a CSV, delivered to your inbox.