Not all OKR tools are created equal
You've got goals — now you need the right tool to track them. But with so many OKR platforms out there, it's easy to end up with something that looks great in demos but doesn't quite fit your team's day-to-day needs. That's why we're comparing Quantive, Viva Goals, and Tability across the dimensions that matter most: user experience, flexibility, scalability, integrations, enterprise readiness, and overall value. Whether you're managing OKRs for a small team or a global org, this side-by-side will help you make a confident, informed decision.
Platform overviews
Quantive

Quantive is an advanced OKR platform designed to help enterprises connect strategy with execution. With deep analytics, automation, and AI-driven insights, Quantive enables organizations to track key results, measure progress, and align teams across all levels.
Its strong data-driven approach makes it a powerful choice for enterprises that require advanced reporting to drive performance.
Viva Goals

Viva Goals is Microsoft's OKR platform, built into the Microsoft Viva suite to help large organizations align their goals with strategic outcomes. As a product designed for enterprises, it offers deep integration with Microsoft Teams, Azure DevOps, and other tools within the Microsoft ecosystem.
While it excels at embedding OKRs into existing Microsoft workflows, Viva Goals is more suitable for companies that already rely heavily on Microsoft products and are looking for a structured, top-down goal-setting approach.
Tability

Tability is an intelligent goal-tracking platform designed to help teams stay focused and aligned with minimal effort. Unlike traditional OKR tools that require frequent manual check-ins, Tability automates progress tracking, provides actionable insights, and makes goal-setting a seamless experience.
With its AI-driven recommendations, intuitive interface, and deep integrations, Tability is the perfect solution for fast-moving teams that want to stay on top of their objectives effortlessly.
At a glance
You will find below a quick overview of the pricing and rating of Quantive, Viva Goals, and Tability. For a more detailed comparison of vendors, you can read our OKR software pricing comparison guide.
Quantive | Viva Goals | Tability | |
---|---|---|---|
Starting cost | $9/user/month | $18/user/month | $6/user/month |
Min. users commitment | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Min. months commitment | 1 | 12 | 1 |
Annual cost for 100 users* | N/A | $21,600/year | $9,600/year |
G2 score | 4.6/5 | 4.3/5 | 4.7/5 |
*Annual cost for 100 users is based on the highest pricing tier that includes SSO/SCIM and meets the requirements of large teams.
OKR Features comparison
We reviewed each vendor's product documentation and public materials to evaluate their feature sets. To keep things actionable, we grouped the key capabilities into three categories: weekly OKR tracking, goal-setting, and reporting/reflection tools. Use this comparison to quickly spot which tools align with your workflow.
Quantive | Viva Goals | Tability | |
---|---|---|---|
Weekly OKR tracking | |||
OKR progress dashboards | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
Visual OKR tree | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
Check-in reminders | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
Initiatives tracking | ❌ | ❌ | ✅ |
Mobile app | ✅ | ❌ | ✅ |
Goal setting | |||
OKR spreadsheet import | ❌ | ❌ | ✅ |
Goal-setting AI | ✅ | ❌ | ✅ |
Custom targets | ✅ | ❌ | ✅ |
Reporting & reflections | |||
Email reports/notifications | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
OKR retrospectives | ❌ | ❌ | ✅ |
Custom dashboards | ✅ | ❌ | ✅ |
Public views | ❌ | ❌ | ✅ |
AI-driven insights | ❌ | ❌ | ✅ |
Integrations
The value of an OKR tool isn’t just in tracking goals — it’s in making those updates effortless. Data connectors reduce manual updates by pulling real progress into your check-ins, while Slack and Teams integrations keep things visible and easy to update in real time. In this section, we evaluate both types of integrations, plus whether each platform supports custom development via a public API.
Quantive | Viva Goals | Tability | |
---|---|---|---|
Slack | ✅ | ❌ | ✅ |
Microsoft Teams | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
Jira | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
ClickUp | ❌ | ❌ | ✅ |
Linear | ❌ | ❌ | ✅ |
Asana | ✅ | ❌ | ✅ |
Notion | ❌ | ❌ | ✅ |
Confluence | ❌ | ❌ | ✅ |
Data connectors | Google Sheets, Excel, Power BI, HubSpot, Salesforce + 15 more | Power BI, Azure DevOps, SharePoint, Excel, HubSpot, Salesforce | Google Sheets, Tableau, Big Query, Power BI, HubSpot, Salesforce, SQL + 15 more |
Zapier | ✅ | ❌ | ✅ |
Public API | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
The winner: Tability

Choosing the right OKR platform is about more than features — it’s about finding the right fit for your team’s workflow and growth. Tability offers a rare combination: frictionless onboarding, the robustness to scale across departments, and pricing that won’t slow down your momentum. For teams seeking high adoption and long-term value, Tability is an excellent choice.