Best OKR Software 2026: I tested the 23 tools that matter

Disclosure: I'm the CEO of Tability, one of the platforms below, and it ranks first on our own benchmark. Discount that as you see fit. It's why the scenario, the scores, the screenshots and the places Tability loses are all published here, and why the benchmark scores categories where Tability doesn't come first.

The short answer. After running the same 30-minute scenario on all twelve, Tability (4.5/5) ranks first. It's the only platform where dashboards, governance and AI come set up right out of the box. Perdoo (4.0) is the best structured alternative and Profit.co (3.5) the third option for teams that also want employee performance management. OKRs Tool is the cheapest real option at $49/month flat, and Teamflect has the most generous free tier at 10 users. The full reasoning, the screenshots and the failures are below.

There are a fair number of "best OKR software" listings written by people who never really tried the tools they're writing about. They describe features from a checklist perspective (does this exist in the docs?) and skip the part that matters (is this easy to do?). That isn't very helpful, because most OKR features are table stakes now. The real difference is in how they're implemented – not whether they exist.

To understand that difference, I spent a few days signing up to the most popular OKR platforms, creating the same sales plan on each one, and then hunting for the things a mid-size or enterprise buyer actually needs: scalability and governance, time-to-value, AI readiness, reporting and conversations, integrations and data connectors, and performance.

That's twelve platforms tested. Eleven more are here without a hands-on test, reviewed from public material. All 23 are ranked together, with the ones I tested marked.

Updated 10 November 2026. Added eleven platforms reviewed from public material and merged all 23 into one ranking. Scores and prices come from The OKR Software Benchmark.

Who this guide is for

The goal isn't to test everything under the sun. It's to look at the best options for mid-size and large teams that want to build a real habit around their goals.

This post is for teams that:

• Have at least 50 people tracking goals on a weekly basis
• Need support for multiple layers of OKRs
• Want visibility across the whole organisation
• Care about accountability more than they care about a pretty tree view

It isn't for teams that are just getting started, or that aren't willing to push people to do the weekly check-ins. If you're still evaluating OKRs, a spreadsheet template is more than enough. Deploying a complete platform too early can discourage a team faster than it helps.

The best OKR software in 2026: my top picks

If you're looking for a quick top 3, here's a shortlist for you. Most platforms here have been hand-tested, except for Workboard, Lattice and Leapsome. Still, these platforms seem to have great capabilities based on their reputation, docs, and reviews, and they deserves one of the top spots.

• Best overall: Tability, Workboard and Perdoo.
• Enterprise: Tability, Workboard, Profit.co and Perdoo.
• Startups: Tability, Mooncamp and OKRs Tool.
• Free: Teamflect, with full functionality for 10 users. Oboard is free for Jira instances of 10 or fewer.
• Cheapest at scale: OKRs Tool at $129 a month above 50 users. Oboard at $2.16 a user for Jira instances.
• Easiest to use: Tability and Mooncamp.
• AI: Tability. Perdoo and Profit.co match it on MCP if querying goals from Claude or ChatGPT is the specific need.
• HR system integrations: Lattice, Leapsome (neither tested).
• Jira shops: Oboard to stay inside Jira, Atlassian Goals if free matters more than depth, Tability or Mooncamp for a full platform where closing issues moves a key result.
• Microsoft Teams: Teamflect if performance management is in the brief. Tability if it isn't.
• Salesforce: Profit.co, then Tability and Perdoo.

A note on enterprise. The benchmark scores enterprise separately, weighting identity, governance and integration depth. Thirteen platforms qualify. WorkBoard and Lattice get to second and third on documentation alone, so put them through your own trial or demo before you believe it. Among the ones I tested, Profit.co moves ahead of Perdoo: the things that make it slow to set up are the things that make it governable. OKRs Tool's bands stop at 51+ with no enterprise contract. Atlassian Goals has the identity plumbing and falls short everywhere else. The scores are in the enterprise ranking.

The chart below plots all 23 on the trade-off that matters most at scale: how easy the platform is to use against how deep it goes. Depth is the average of the benchmark scores for OKR features, reporting, integrations and AI.

All 23 OKR platforms compared

Overall benchmark score out of 5, with review counts in brackets. ✋ means hand-tested and 📚 means reviewed from public material, not tested. Documentation can't catch what a session catches, so read the 📚 scores with care.

Prices verified between July and November 2026, with the date on each benchmark profile. Estimates are labelled. For what each platform costs at 25, 100, 500 or 2,000 seats, see cost by company size.

Two things about that table.

The review scores all sit between 4.1 and 4.8 and tell you almost nothing. The counts tell you a lot: Perdoo has 502, OKRs Tool has 7, Mooncamp's Gartner figure is two people. Aggregate ratings measure satisfaction among people who already chose the tool. They don't measure fit for a rollout.

On pricing, 13 of the 20 platforms in the benchmark publish USD pricing and 6 are quote-only: Workboard, Profit.co, Rhythms, Cascade, Jira Align and Leapsome. Every major free plan caps at 12 seats or fewer, so a free tier is a way to trial, not a way to run 50 people.

👋 Hand tested platforms

Tability – 4.5/5

Disclosure: our company · Full benchmark profile · tability.io

Best for: mid-market and enterprise teams that want the fastest time-to-value for OKRI and KPIs, with built-in dashboards and AI in the workflow.

‍Not for: HR-led rollouts, employee performance management.

Overview: Tability is our OKR platform. We built it with ease of use and scale in mind, because OKRs can feel like extra reporting to the people doing the work, and a platform's first job is to stay out of the way. What stands out about Tability is how little you have to assemble: the plan is the dashboard, cadence and permissions are decided when you create it, and the AI works across the product rather than sitting in a chat window. The trade-off is scope. We don't do performance management, and the HRIS side is thin. Read this profile with my bias in mind and check it against the ones below.

Strengths

• The plan is the dashboard. Presentation mode, strategy map, dependencies map and Workspace Insights come without building anything.
• Governance built for a rollout: plan creation restricted to owners and admins, per-plan editing permissions, a dedicated IT Admin role, SAML SSO and SCIM for Entra ID and Okta, IP allowlisting, audit history
• Hosting in the EU, Australia and the US.
• Measurement that fits the goal: start-to-target, stay above or below a threshold, milestone counts, rollups from contributing key results, and an optional KPI module for ongoing metrics.
• AI across the product rather than one chat door: MCP server, AI mode that lets you talk to your data in-app, coaching on plan quality before you publish.
• Serious initiative-tracking module allowing you to use the OKRI approach and map the work in progress against each key result.
• KPI supported as a separate module
• Data connectors to Salesforce, HubSpot, Amplitude, Power BI, Tableau, BigQuery, PostgreSQL and JQL issue counts, refreshed daily or weekly. Initiatives sync from Jira, Linear, Asana and ClickUp.
• Pricing scales really well with 2 read-only seats offered per Premium seat purchased
• SOC2 and GDPR compliant

Where it falls short

• No free plan.
• No performance management and limited HRIS integrations, so if goals feed reviews you'll need to pair it with an HR platform.
• Tability limits customisation on purpose. Some design decisions are made to save you time instead of letting you create hundreds of different custom fields.

Unique features. Things I found on Tability and on two or fewer other platforms.

• Multi-team import from one spreadsheet. Nowhere else in the test.
• Scheduled prompts that draft a recurring business review from live data and send it to named recipients daily, weekly, monthly or quarterly. Nowhere else.
• Agent Workforce Manager (open beta): an AI manager assigned to a goal, with its outputs and blockers tracked in the same reporting as the humans. The only platform scoring above 2 on in-product agents.
• Net confidence score, green minus red as a percentage, one number to compare team health across a company.
• A direct-reports view (shared only with Perdoo and Weekdone) and admin control over who creates OKRs (shared only with Weekdone).

Core screenshots

Pricing‍

• $6/user/month Basic, $10 Premium, annual ($7 and $12 monthly).
• Premium includes two free read-only seats per paid seat.
• Enterprise is custom. No free plan, 14-day trial.

Perdoo – 4.0/5

Full benchmark profile · perdoo.com

Best for: teams looking for structured OKRs with KPI support.

Not for: teams needing ready-made leadership dashboards or advanced governance permissions.

Overview: Perdoo is an OKR platform built around a structured cascade from company goals down to teams, for organisations that want discipline in their framework more than flexibility. What stands out about Perdoo is how quickly you get going: the text importer parsed my whole scenario in one go, and the per-person dashboards give you a way to read the org that most of this field lacks. Where it left me wanting was leadership reporting. The numbers come first, the comments come last, and the dashboards are yours to build.

Strengths

• One of the fastest setups in the benchmark, with targets parsed correctly from plain text.
• A dashboard for every person showing their OKRs, which most of this field is missing.
• Goal tree with dependencies and a KPI board.
• Initiatives are first-class, with a documented warning when a key result you're writing is really an initiative.
• MCP server behind ChatGPT and Claude apps, an open API, and connectors that reach into HRIS territory with BambooHR, Factorial and Azure AD.

Where it falls short

• In-app AI stops at the importer. A workspace-aware assistant is documented as coming.
• Few dashboards out of the box, no ready-made view of what's red, and no presentation mode I could find.
• Goal titles ellipse on a laptop in Explore view, which makes list views hard to read.
• Enterprise controls are thin beyond SSO and domain acceptance: no control over who creates OKRs, no notification management, no IP restrictions.
• No monthly billing.

Core screenshots

Pricing‍

• Free to 5 users. Premium $9/user/month, Supreme $11, annual or quarterly only, minimum 5 paid seats.

Profit.co – 3.5/5

Full benchmark profile · profit.co

Best for: OKRs, performance management and tasks under one contract, with patience to configure it.

Not for: teams that want something navigable without training, or published pricing.

Overview: Profit.co is an all-in-one platform that bundles OKRs with performance management, tasks and a large integration catalogue, for organisations that want one system for everything and have an admin who'll configure it. What stands out about Profit.co is depth: the check-in worked out for itself that I was 14.3% behind plan, and the enterprise controls and connectors go further than anything else I tested. What it costs you is time. Every key result is a KPI you define first, the interface is busy, and I came away thinking of it as an advanced spreadsheet with a serious back end.

Strengths

• Smart check-in confidence: the confidence is adjusted automatically based on the expected progress.
• Comments support audio and video.
• The deepest enterprise controls I tested: user access and email domain restrictions, granular roles, public API and webhooks.
• A 21-connector catalogue from Slack and Jira to Snowflake, BigQuery and Tableau. First in the benchmark for Salesforce shops.
• Performance management and a task module in the same system.
• MCP connector for Claude and ChatGPT documented.

Where it falls short

• Every key result is a KPI you must define first, so creation is slow and form-heavy. No importer.
• Tasks and initiatives are separate systems, and my initiative landed as a non-contributing key result.
• Reporting reads like an advanced spreadsheet. Presentation mode is a slide-deck download, not a view in the app.
• The Cockpit's KPI board told me I had no OKRs defined with KPIs when I did.
• No cascading view and no per-person views. Profiles show a manager and a department, not goals.
• AI needs your own API key and was out of reach on my trial. Connecting a data source took real effort.
• The UI general feels heavy and a bit outdated in some parts

Core screenshots

Pricing

‍Not published. Formerly around $9/user/month, now custom quotes with a minimum annual spend around $10,000. 30-day trial.

Rhythms – 3.3/5

Full benchmark profile · rhythms.ai

Best for: teams that already work through Claude or ChatGPT all day.

Not for: anyone who wants a fast conventional interface first, or a price before the sales call.

Overview: Rhythms is a new platform created by the team behind Ally.io (an OKR platform acquired and then sunsetted by Microsoft). Rhythms is taking a bit of a different approach. It isn't an OKR platform with AI, it's an AI platform that can do OKRs. This flip means that many actions are done by talking to an AI assistant rather than clicking through a product. This bet works in some cases (it built my plan from one pasted message), but it can also introduce some friction when you want to quickly set up a data connector or edit a specific KR. It also seems that what's not AI isn't getting as much love: a small key result panel, one report type, an app that has to always think before showing data.

Strengths

• Rhythms is betting hard on AI and you can do many actions through the internal AI mode.
• The check-in quietly beats bigger names: a value, a status I chose myself, and the expected value for the date shown next to my actual.
• Cadence and reminders configure per team rather than per workspace.
• Check-in Coverage and Compliance reports built for an OKR champion, clearer than the equivalents in Mooncamp or Profit.co.
• The largest connector catalogue in the test at 198 tools, with key results that auto-update from connected sources.

Where it falls short

• Rhythms takes an AI-first approach to the UI. This is great in some aspects, but can get in the way when you just want to set up a data connector or add a KR.
• UI is noticeably slow to respond even without a lot of data in it.
• One report type out of the box, then you build your own views.
• The key result panel is small and can't be enlarged.
• No per-person dashboards, no restrictions on who creates content, and chat-first navigation buries the current state of your OKRs. Slow at times.
• Pricing not transparent -- can be a costly solution to deploy

Core screenshots

Pricing

‍Not published. The site leads with a free-forever plan with limited AI credits. Estimates are anchored on the withdrawn $22/user/month list price. Enterprise custom with SSO, SCIM and audit logs.

Mooncamp – 3.3/5

Full benchmark profile · mooncamp.com

Best for: clean, manual OKR tracking your team will actually use.

Not for: anyone who needs AI, or ability to scale rapidly with importers and leadership-ready reporting.

Overview: Mooncamp is an EU-based OKR platform designed to feel like Notion: flexible goal types, a clean editor, and as little process as possible, for teams that want their OKRs to look and feel like the rest of their tools. What stands out about Mooncamp is how easy it is to set up. I scored it 5 on ease of use. What I kept looking for and not finding was everything a rollout needs to scale after the first team is in: an importer, an API, AI of any kind, and reporting you don't have to build yourself.

Strengths

• Great core OKR workflow: proper start and target values with threshold options, weighted rollups from sub-items, multiple parent objectives, and a progress chart on every key result.
• Clean cascade view making it easy to scan the OKRs in a workspace
• Custom goal types let you name and shape your own hierarchy.
• EU-based, GDPR compliant, familiar if your team uses Notion.

Where it falls short

• Can feel like an extra spreadsheet. Feedback and conversations feel buried.
• No importer and no bulk administration, so every goal is a form. For a 40-team rollout that's the whole problem.
• No AI surface and no MCP found. No public API, no webhooks.
• Nine data connectors in-app, four gated to Pro, and Jira connects through an API token feed rather than a true sync.
• Dashboards are built by hand and there's no presentation mode.
• No people view.
• Access rules control who can see a goal, not who can create one, which I verified with a second user. SAML with SCIM sits behind the 100-plus-user Enterprise plan.

Core screenshots

Pricing

‍Essential €7, Professional €10 per user per month, annual only, minimum 5 seats and 100+ for enterprise. No free plan, 14-day trial.

Oboard – 3.1/5

Full benchmark profile · oboard.io

Best for: teams that live in Jira and want good check-in discussions at a very low price.

Not for: scaling across many teams, or anyone who needs SCIM.

Overview: Oboard is an OKR app that lives inside Jira and is sold through the Atlassian Marketplace, for engineering organisations that won't adopt another tool and want their goals next to their tickets. What stands out about Oboard is the check-in: a status you control, comments built for discussion, reactions and replies, on the cheapest platform in this guide. The dashboards surprised me too. What limits it is the Jira boundary. No connectors beyond Jira, no SCIM of its own, units capped at five characters, and no way to see one person's goals.

Strengths

• Discussion is front and centre on the check-in, where plenty of pricier platforms bury it.
• Each key result has a progress graph and updates roll up to the objective.
• Reporting that surprised me for a tool this light: a default dashboard with cycle progress and status counts, a per-team performance report, and custom dashboards from text, KPI and OKR widgets.
• Bulk linking of Jira issues and epics to key results with JQL, with weighted progress calculation as work closes.

Where it falls short

• Units capped at five characters, so "demos per month" lives in the title.
• Teams attach like tags rather than structure, and the map reads as a cascade, not a team comparison.
• Identity comes through Jira rather than the app's own SAML, and there's no SCIM.
• No data connectors for key results beyond Jira, so manual updates everywhere.
• Visibility controls but no who-can-create or who-can-edit.
• No per-person views. No AI appeared in the edition I tested.

Pricing

‍Billed per Jira instance via the Atlassian Marketplace. Free for 10 or fewer users, then $2.16/user/month up to 100, declining with volume.

Teamflect – 3.1/5

Full benchmark profile · teamflect.com

Best for: Microsoft-heavy organisations that want performance management with light OKRs.

Not for: OKRs that scale, or anyone who needs SCIM.

Overview: Teamflect is a performance management platform for Microsoft 365 that includes OKRs alongside reviews, meetings, tasks and recognition, for HR-led organisations that live in Teams and want one app for all of it. What stands out about Teamflect is the free tier, ten users with everything, and the conversation you can have on a key result, which bigger products can't match. What it isn't is an OKR tool first. The model is loose, metrics stop at three types, there are no progress charts, and its AI couldn't find the goal I'd just created.

Strengths

• You can reply and hold a real conversation on a key result, with mentions, which several bigger platforms lack.
• The check-in itself was easy: value, status set myself, comment posted.
• Meetings, tasks and performance reviews are proper parts of the product. My lead-routing initiative went straight into the native tasks module.
• The most generous free tier in the test.

Where it falls short

• The OKR model is loose. Objectives can carry their own metric, and the key result form is titled "Objective title".
• Metric types stop at percentage, number and currency, so my hours-based key result became a bare number.
• No progress charts anywhere, only bars, so trends are invisible.
• Basic cascading view, no way to see teams side by side.
• Sign-in via Microsoft 365 rather than the app's own SAML, no SCIM. Data connectors stop at Excel, Planner, Power BI and Power Automate.
• No per-person views, no self-set check-in reminders. Ask AI failed the grounding test and I found no MCP server.

Pricing. Free for up to 10 users with full functionality, the most generous free tier in the benchmark. Essential $7/user/month annual, Professional $11. The AI Agent is limited on Essential and unlimited on Professional.

Cascade – 3.1/5

Full benchmark profile · cascade.app

Best for: a numbers-driven strategy office reporting to executives quarterly.

Not for: an OKR practice that runs on team judgement and conversation.

Overview: Cascade is a strategy execution platform for leadership teams that plan top-down: focus areas, objectives, measures and projects, reported quarterly. It's aimed at the strategy office more than the team doing the work. What stands out about Cascade is the reporting. It generated an executive quarterly review with an AI-written analysis I'd have been happy to send to a board. What worked against it is everything before that moment: a setup that fights the OKR model, a confidence score you can't override, and check-ins you can't reply to or find again.

Strengths

• The best single thing I saw in twelve sessions: I asked for an executive quarterly review and Cascade generated it, with an AI-written overview that flagged the two stalled measures, quantified the gap and suggested a conversation with the owner, with a presentation view on top.
• Strong top-down strategy workflows and visibility across goals, KPIs and initiatives.
• A metric tree where metrics feed each other by calculation, manually, or from an integration.
• The update form gives comments real space with attachments.

Where it falls short

• Confidence is computed against the expected line with no owner override. The failure mode is the hot start that goes flat and stays green.
• Check-ins are hard to find again, there's no way to comment on one, and I couldn't work out how to edit a target.
• No standing dashboards and no quick filter for what's red, so ongoing tracking is much weaker than quarter-end reporting.
• The trial exposed three connectors against a mature catalogue on the website. I read that as a trial limit, but test it.
• No MCP found. Slow throughout.

Pricing. Free for 2 users. Paid tiers are contact-sales. Third-party estimates put it at $19-29/user/month by volume.

OKRs Tool – 3.0/5

Full benchmark profile · okrstool.com

Best for: a small team on a tight budget that can live with rough edges.

Not for: a rollout, or anyone who needs automatic updates and AI that reads goals correctly.

Overview: OKRs Tool is a low-cost OKR platform on a flat monthly fee rather than a per-seat price, for small teams that want a lot of features for very little money. What stands out about OKRs Tool is ambition: an AI drafter, a free MCP server, an initiatives board and more pre-made reports than anything I tested. What it needs is another year. The import set every baseline to zero, my corrections wouldn't display, reports spun without loading, and the AI Coach didn't know my objective had key results.

Strengths

• Great for teams on a budget.
• More pre-made reporting than anything I tested: trends, insights, a risk view, auto-generated monthly and quarterly reviews, a momentum map, an initiatives board, an in-app present mode.

Where it falls short

• Import set every baseline to zero and the interface kept showing old values after I corrected them.
• The AI Coach seems flakey: it built its recommendation on the claim that my objective had no key results (it had some).
• Slow, and several reports never loaded.
• No per-key-result page or trend chart. Metric formats stop at number, percentage and yes/no.
• No data connectors.
• Pricing bands stop at 51+ with no enterprise contract. Seven G2 reviews.

Pricing

‍$49 a month flat up to 50 users, $129 unlimited above that. Free for 1-5 users. First in the benchmark's affordable category.

Weekdone – 2.5/5

Full benchmark profile · weekdone.com

Best for: three or fewer people learning OKRs on the free tier.

Not for: anyone who wants owner-set confidence, trend charts, AI or connectors.

Overview

‍Weekdone is one of the older OKR tools on the market, combining quarterly OKRs with weekly plans and KPIs, for small teams that want structure without much configuration. What stands out about Weekdone is the Tree view, and a restriction on who can create OKRs that only Tability also offers. What dates it is the check-in: no chart for a key result, comments detached from the value you logged, and a confidence score the product picks for you.

Strengths

• The Tree view is the clearest read of the structure.
• One of only two platforms here that let an admin restrict who creates OKRs, the other being Tability.
• KPIs alongside OKRs and a working presentation mode.
• A per-person view.

Where it falls short

• Statuses are auto-assigned from progress with no override. You cannot say "we're at 48 but I'm worried." That alone would stop me recommending it for check-ins.
• Comments aren't attached to the value you logged.
• Basic bar-chart reporting, well behind the field. No AI.
• Integrations stop at Slack, Teams and task links. No data connectors. No SCIM.
• The team page buries OKRs under personal OKRs, personal KPIs and projects in one busy screen.

Pricing

‍Free for 3 users, volume pricing from about $9/user/month, unconfirmed because the vendor's pricing page was erroring when re-checked.

Atlassian Goals – 2.4/5

Full benchmark profile · atlassian.com

Best for: free, lightweight goal visibility inside Atlassian with Rovo on top.

Not for: anyone serious about OKRs.

Overview: Atlassian Goals is the goal-tracking feature included with Atlassian cloud plans, connecting objectives to Jira work and Confluence pages, for teams already in Atlassian who want lightweight visibility without buying anything. What stands out about Atlassian Goals is Rovo, which found and summarised the goal I'd just created when paid products couldn't, and the discussion thread under each update. What holds it back is that it's oddly manual for something inside Jira: a separate form for every measure, tickets you paste in by URL, and no reporting beyond cards.

Strengths

• Free is a real argument.
• Rovo passed the grounding test where paid products failed, finding my goal with owner, status and dates correct.
• A Rovo MCP server exists for the setup-tolerant.
• Updates carry a real discussion thread, because Jira's commenting is good.
• Identity comes through Atlassian, so SSO and SCIM are whatever you already run.

Where it falls short

• No cascading or strategy maps, no generated reports, and success measures shown as thin cards that read poorly for a manager.
• Metrics are separate objects with their own target dates.
• You can't create a ticket from a goal, which is the OKR-to-initiative flow run backwards.
• No data connectors and no reminder settings I could find.
• Enough setup to feel like work, without the richness to justify it.

Pricing. Included with every Atlassian cloud plan. More capabilities in the paid Strategy Collection.

Range – 2.1/5

Full benchmark profile · range.co

Best for: weekly team rituals: async check-ins, meetings, mood and kudos.

Not for: OKRs.

Overview. Range is an async team tool for daily check-ins, meetings and team health, with goals attached. It's built for distributed teams that want a weekly rhythm, not for OKRs. What stands out about Range is the design, up there with the best I tested. What rules it out here is the goal model: no key results, a metric that only appears when you post an update, and every metric starting at zero.

Strengths

• An interface up there with the best-designed tools I tested.
• 75+ integrations that attach work items to check-ins.
• The most generous free tier in the field at 12 users.

Where it falls short

• No key results and no metric at creation.
• No baseline on any metric.
• No progress chart, no commenting on updates once shared.

Pricing. Free for 12 users, then $8/user/month.

📚 Reviewed via docs and resources

WorkBoard – 4.0/5

Documentation-based benchmark profile · workboard.com

Best for: very large organisations in heavily regulated environments that need tight control, with the budget for a services-led rollout.

Not for: teams that want to stay nimble, a trial before a sales call, or a fast rollout.

Overview. WorkBoard is a mature enterprise strategy execution platform sold through demos and services. It absorbed Quantive in 2025. It's one of the most complete products in the category on paper. Think of it like deploying Jira across a company: powerful, tightly controlled, and a project in its own right. The current pitch leans on dashboards and AI agents built around specific roles, such as a portfolio analyst, a chief of staff and a leadership coach. They cover similar ground to Tability's AI mode, packaged per use case. For a very large company in a regulated industry, it's one of the top choices in this guide. For a team trying to stay agile, the weight is likely to get in the way.

Strengths

• A mature, complete platform with strong business review tooling.
• Role-specific AI agents and AI briefings.
• A deep integration library, including the Quantive connectors absorbed in 2025.
• Of the four enterprise platforms I couldn't trial, the one that looks most built for teams to work on goals together.

Where it falls short

• One of the most expensive platforms on the market, with a long, services-led deployment.
• Heavy for organisations that don't need that level of control.
• No trial, so untested here.

What to ask in your sales demo‍

• How can I see a team's weekly check-in and the discussion around it.
• How long from contract to the first team checking in?
• Can I query my WorkBoard data from Claude or ChatGPT?

Pricing

‍Quote-only. Deployed cost with services seem to run well above the list prices in this guide. At 2,000 users it could be a seven-figure decision.

Peoplebox – 3.3/5

Documentation-based benchmark profile · Reviewed from public material, November 2026 · peoplebox.ai

Best for: product, engineering and leadership teams that want OKRs and business reviews in the same suite as performance reviews.

Not for: teams that want to try the product before talking to sales, or a vendor whose main focus is goals.

Overview: Peoplebox sells OKRs as one module in a talent suite, next to performance reviews, 360 feedback and compensation. They're leaning heavily on the AI agents angle for HR, and goals come further down. The OKR module itself reads well on paper: goals that cascade from company to team to individual, business reviews, and key results that update from tools like Jira. The main question mark is around the focus of the platform. When the headline moves to hiring, I'd want to know how much of the roadmap still goes to goals.

What to ask in your sales demo

• Can I connect a key result to Jira or a database?
• Show me the business review that comes out of it?
• How much of this year's roadmap is goals, and how much is hiring

Pricing
‍$8/user/month per module, billed annually, and $26 with every module. Enterprise is custom. Demo-led, with no free tier or trial listed.

Benchmark score
‍3.3 overall, from documentation. Third of nine for HRIS integrations. No enterprise score yet.

Workpath – 3.1/5

Documentation-based benchmark profile · Reviewed from public material, November 2026 · workpath.com

Best for: large European enterprises on the Microsoft stack that manage by KPIs first and want consulting alongside the software.

Not for: teams that want a modern, lightweight OKR tool, or a trial before a sales call.

Overview. Workpath is a strategy execution platform for large enterprises, with Siemens Energy, Bayer and Philips among the logos on its site. Like WorkBoard, it now leads with AI agents. KPIs come first in the product story and OKRs second. The website shows very little of the product itself, and what I found in help articles and videos looks dated and form-heavy. That's why it isn't near the top of my list: updating goals looks like work. I couldn't confirm that hands-on, because the only trial comes after a demo.

Strengths

• KPIs, goals and initiatives in one platform.
• Deep Microsoft integration: Teams, Power BI, Planner, Azure DevOps and Entra ID.
• ISO 27001 and TISAX certification with EU hosting, which matters to German manufacturing and automotive buyers.
• AI aimed at goal quality: drafting key results, a quality checker, and flags for duplicated or conflicting goals across teams.

Where it falls short

• The interface looks dated and form-heavy in the material I could find.
• The website keeps the product out of sight. I had to dig through help articles and videos to see a real screen.
• Licensing takes work to model: modules, three licence types, and a separate licence for analytics.
• Nothing in the screenshots or videos shows a team discussing a goal.
• No trial without a demo, so untested here.

What to ask in your sales demo:

• Skip the slides and update a key result in front of me
• Can I see where a team discusses a check-in.
• What can Claude or Copilot read through your MCP server?

Pricing:‍

Quote-only, based on modules, licence mix and contract length, with a one-year minimum. A 14-day test is offered after a demo, as well as a 3–4 month proof of value.

15Five – 3.1/5, reviewed, not tested

Documentation-based benchmark profile · Reviewed from public material, November 2026 · 15five.com

Best for: HR teams that want OKRs feeding 1:1s and performance reviews.

Not for: a strategy or ops team that wants OKRs as the main product.

Overview. 15Five is a performance management platform with OKRs included. The homepage is about reviews, engagement and manager coaching, and OKRs only show up in the navigation and on the pricing page. That tells you where goals sit in the product. What's there is sensible: objectives with weighted key results, parent and child alignment, and a bulk import from CSV. Pricing is fully public, which I always appreciate. The site names Jira and Salesforce integrations, but the benchmark couldn't verify a connector that updates a key result. It's a fair choice when HR owns the goal process. It's a weak one when a leadership team wants a cockpit.

What to ask during your sales demo

• Can you connect a KR to Salesforce data?
• Can I see what view a COO would open on Monday, not the HR view?

Pricing

‍OKRs sit in the Perform tier at $11/user/month. Total Platform is $16. Annual billing only. The Kona AI add-on is $2 per employee a month.

ClearPoint Strategy – 3.1/5

Documentation-based benchmark profile · Reviewed from public material, November 2026 · clearpointstrategy.com

Best for: a strategy or performance office that produces scorecards and board reports for a public agency, utility, hospital or bank.

Not for: teams that want a place to discuss goals every week.

Overview. ClearPoint Strategy is strategy reporting software built around scorecards, dashboards and reporting workflows. Its site shows the product straight away, which I liked, and what it shows is dashboards. OKRs are listed as one option among several. The best description I have is a BI tool for strategy. You go there for a report that supports a conversation, and the conversation happens somewhere else. Most of those reports look like something you assemble yourself. If the job is producing dashboards and briefing books for leadership, it's worth a look. If the job is a weekly habit for teams, I'd look elsewhere.

Strengths

• The product is visible on the website, dashboards included.
• Reporting workflows with reminders, approvals and scheduled briefing books in PDF, PowerPoint or Excel.
• Wide data connectivity: a scheduled data loader, connectors for SQL Server, Snowflake, Power BI, Tableau and Jira, an API and an MCP integration.
• SOC 2 Type II, SAML SSO and revision history.

Where it falls short

• Reporting-first. Nothing in the material shows a team discussing a goal.
• Dashboards and reports look like something you build, not something that comes with the plan.
• OKRs are listed but barely described, with no mention of check-ins or confidence.
• API and MCP access depend on the integration tier in your quote.
• No trial, only an interactive tour, so untested here.

What to ask in your sales demo:‍

• What dashboards come out of the box
• Can I see how a team can discuss things that are off track?

Pricing‍

Quote-only, with a 10-user minimum. Price depends on user band, support level, integration tier and the number of scorecards and dashboards. ClearPoint says most teams are set up and running their first update cycle within 30 days.

Lattice – 2.8/5

Documentation-based benchmark profile · Reviewed from public material, November 2026 · lattice.com

Best for: HR and leadership teams that already run reviews and engagement in Lattice.

Not for: teams that want OKRs as the centre of the product, or work tracked next to goals.

Overview. Lattice is a performance management suite with a Goals and OKRs module. Its OKR page is honest about the pitch: goals show up in 1:1s, status updates and performance reviews, so employees see how their work connects to the company. The screenshots show clean department dashboards and a simple key result form. Lattice ranks first in the benchmark for HRIS integrations and third for enterprise, which tells you where its strength is: identity, people data and governance. The OKR layer is thinner. The page says little about how check-ins work or how confidence is set, and the benchmark hasn't verified the Jira and Salesforce updates Lattice mentions as a scheduled connector.

What to ask in your sales demo:

• ‍‍Show me a weekly check-in on a key result, with the discussion around it
• Can you connect this KR to Salesforce and show me the refresh?

Pricing‍

Goals and OKRs is $8/user/month. The Foundations bundle is $13. Annual billing only, with a $4,000 annual minimum. No free tier or trial.

JOP – 2.8/5, reviewed, not tested

Documentation-based benchmark profile · Reviewed from public material, November 2026 · getjop.com

Best for: small teams and startups that want performance management and OKRs at a low price.

Not for: teams that need a public API, deep integrations or strong reporting.

Overview. JOP stands for Joy of Performing. It calls itself a continuous performance management platform, and OKRs are one part of it next to tasks, 1:1s, feedback and recognition. The site talks about OKRs and KPIs with visual goal maps, and says very little about how a check-in works. It publishes prices in rupees and quotes US customers, and the testimonials I saw come mostly from Indian startups. The price is the argument here. If budget decides and you want reviews and goals in one tool, it's worth a look.

Pricing

‍About $6.50/user/month, estimated from the Rs. 250 list price. The Startup plan is free for one quarter for teams of up to 10.

Betterworks – 2.6/5

Documentation-based benchmark profile · Reviewed from public material, November 2026 · betterworks.com

Best for: HR teams in organisations of 500 people or more that run performance management and continuous conversations.

Not for: smaller teams, or anyone who wants OKRs as the main product.

Overview. Betterworks was one of the first OKR products, and it has moved to the performance management space over the years, making it more an HR-led product than a strategy-focused platform. It's hard to get a full picture of the capabilities of the software but a look at their website and docs shows that the features lean heavily toward employee engagement, included their new AI features. Goals and OKRs are presented as a module inside the platform.

Now from a look at their demo it seems that the OKR module covers the core table stakes and include an AI that can do recommendations. But at the same time, it was not possible to validate the depth of integrations, the flexibility of reporting, and for companies that put OKRs at the center, this might not be the right fit. I'd shortlist it for an HR-led programme at scale. I wouldn't for a strategy team that wants to move fast.

Pricing

‍Performance is $8/user/month and $9 with Talent Intelligence. Implementation is a separate one-off cost. No free tier, and no trial listed.

Envisio – 2.4/5

Documentation-based benchmark profile · Reviewed from public material, November 2026 · envisio.com

Best for: public agencies such as councils, universities and health services that publish progress on a multi-year strategic plan and tie it to budgets.

Not for: private companies, or anyone looking for OKRs specifically.

Overview. Envisio is strategic planning and performance software for the public sector. It says it works exclusively with government, education, healthcare and nonprofit organisations, and its site doesn't mention OKRs. It's here because public agencies with external reporting obligations are the one case where a separate planning layer makes sense. The product tour reminded me of Microsoft Project and SharePoint: structured, form-driven and built for reporting upward. If you need budgets and public dashboards alongside the plan, that's a real advantage over the OKR platforms in this guide. If you want OKRs, it brings more complexity than you need.

Strengths

• Built for public-sector reporting, with public dashboards and design support included.
• Budget data from Questica pulled into plans and reports.
• Unlimited users on both plans.
• SSO, training and a customer success manager included in every quote.

Where it falls short

• No OKRs, confidence ratings or weekly check-ins in anything I could find.
• A form-heavy interface in the style of Microsoft Project or SharePoint.
• Built for reporting upward, with no visible room for team discussion.
• AI limited to writing help: rewriting updates and summarising reports.
• No trial, so untested here.

Pricing

‍Quote-only, with two tiers. Starter covers one plan and one public dashboard. Enterprise adds unlimited plans and dashboards. Capterra and GetApp list a starting price of US$20,000 a year. There's no trial.

Jira Align – 2.4/5

Documentation-based benchmark profile · Reviewed from public material, November 2026 · atlassian.com

Best for: portfolio and transformation teams in large organisations that already run on Jira and want strategy tied to delivery.

Not for: smaller teams, or anyone who wants a weekly check-in habit.

Overview. Jira Align is Atlassian's enterprise portfolio platform. Its product page doesn't mention OKRs once. It talks about portfolios, programs, value streams and frameworks like SAFe, for companies coordinating hundreds of teams. Objectives and key results exist in the product, and Atlassian's support articles show how to view their progress, but the benchmark lists no regular check-ins. That makes it a planning and reporting layer above Jira, not a place where teams discuss goals each week. If you want OKRs in the Atlassian stack without the portfolio layer, Oboard and Atlassian Goals are both tested in this guide.

Pricing

‍Around $129/user/month, estimated. Atlassian's Strategy Collection lists $77,400 a year for 1 to 50 users. Annual contracts only, no trial.

Leapsome – 2.4/5

Documentation-based benchmark profile · Reviewed from public material, November 2026 · leapsome.com

Best for: HR and people ops teams in mid-size companies that want goals next to reviews, surveys and learning.

Not for: teams that want a pure OKR product or a public price.

Overview. Leapsome is a people platform that bundles goals with reviews, engagement surveys and learning. Its goals page is one of the clearer ones among the HR suites. It shows a goal tree that connects company, team and individual objectives, dashboards that flag outdated goals and compare teams, and Jira issues linked to objectives. AI suggests goals and initiatives and writes summaries. It ranks second in the benchmark for HRIS integrations. On OKR depth it's light, with no KPI tracking and no data connectors listed. It does have a 14-day trial, so you can check all of this yourself.

Pricing

‍Quote-based and modular. Third-party estimates run from $11/user/month for a single module to $30 or more for the full stack. Customer Success services carry a $6,000 annual minimum. 14-day trial.

How OKR software was evaluated

What matters for enterprise OKRs in 2026

Core OKR features are now table stakes. Every serious platform has objectives, key results, check-ins and a tree view. What separates platforms at scale is how fast you can onboard 400 people and fit the platform into your existing workflows.

I weight AI and agent readiness heavily. Claude and ChatGPT are becoming one of the main ways people interact with their goals. It's easier for an executive to ask Claude for a summary of progress than to remember where a report lives. Agents are on the same trajectory. A goal system that can't be read from outside itself, and can't model a non-human owner, is one you'll be replacing inside two years.

Performance isn't scored in the benchmark, but a slow app loses the rollout, so I flag it wherever it showed up. Every score in this article is the published benchmark score, with criteria and weights at tability.io/compare/methodology.

What to look for in an enterprise OKR platform

Take these questions into a demo. Each one exposes a gap in under a minute.

• Fast setup. "Here's our sales plan as text. Get it into the product." If it's three forms per key result, multiply by your team count.
• AI that reads your data. Create an objective, then ask the platform's AI mode to summarise it. Most of the twelve I tested couldn't. Who has what is scored here.
• Alignment. "Show me the strategy map for a plan you didn't prepare for this call."
• Reporting. "It's Thursday, the leadership meeting is tomorrow. What do I put on the screen?" Then: "Pull up one of my direct reports." Different stakeholders need different views.
• Initiatives. "Three weeks from now, how do I answer 'what are we doing about the demos number' without asking anyone?" Look for initiatives that sit under the key result they support.
• Permissions. "Stop me creating a plan." SCIM was documented on 7 of the 12 platforms I tested, and creation restrictions on 2. The enterprise security comparison shows who ships what.
• Connectors. "Connect this key result to a live number." Six of the twelve could, through data connectors. The other six update by hand.

Hand-tested vs. reviews

Hand-tested. One 30-minute session per platform, timed from signup, on the same quarterly plan for a sales team.

Objective: Build a predictable sales pipeline
KR1: Increase qualified demos from 40 to 60 per month
KR2: Increase demo-to-opportunity conversion from 12% to 18%
KR3: Reduce lead response time from 18 to 6 hours
Initiative: Launch a new lead routing workflow

The key results are deliberately awkward. One starts above zero, one is a percentage, one goes down and is measured in hours. They tripped eight of the twelve. Then I looked at check-ins and reminders, reporting, data connectors, governance and AI on each platform. Copy the block and you can run the same test yourself.

This isn't a reliability study, a security review or an assessment of support.

Reviewed. Eleven platforms are here without a test. WorkBoard, Workpath, Envisio and ClearPoint Strategy have no trial without a sales call, and I haven't run the scenario on the other seven. I went through what a buyer can see before a demo: the website, the pricing page, the help centre and any product tour. Read those profiles as first impressions. None of the session failures would show up this way, so their place in the ranking is less certain.

One pattern stood out. The enterprise platforms sell dashboards and AI agents, and very little of their material shows a team discussing a goal.

What's not on this list, and why

Most of the 23 are OKR-first platforms. A few come from neighbouring categories because they show up on the same shortlists: HR suites like Lattice and 15Five, strategy reporting tools like Envisio and ClearPoint Strategy, and Jira Align. If multi-year planning is what you're after, our best strategic planning software guide goes deeper.

Two kinds of tool are out.

OKR tools that aren't ready for mid-market and enterprise. There are dozens of newer OKR apps. Most don't yet have the SSO, permissions, reporting or track record that a rollout of 50 people or more needs. A few of the tools I did test turned out not to be ready either, and their profiles say so.

Tools where goals are a side feature. Asana, ClickUp, monday.com and other project tools are good at work and poor at outcomes. A Notion or spreadsheet setup works beautifully up to about 10 people and then becomes somebody's unpaid second job. They do their main job well. Goals are an afterthought, and it shows.

HR suites are the exception I made, because buyers keep asking how they compare. My view on them hasn't changed. They're fine if HR owns your goal process and you want OKRs to feed 1:1s and reviews. They fall over the moment a strategy or ops team wants a leadership cockpit.

OKR software capabilities compared

Scores by criterion

The eleven rows marked not tested are documentation-based scores.

Among the twelve I tested, six have a documented MCP server, six can update a key result from a data source, three have webhooks, three make you build a metric object before a key result, two decide your confidence for you, two let an admin restrict who creates OKRs, and on three I never found the reminder setting.

The question that matters on Jira is whether closing issues moves a key result. The documentation establishes that for Tability (JQL issue counts as a data source, refreshed daily or weekly), Mooncamp (issue mapping with automatic progress calculation) and Oboard (bulk JQL linking with weighted progress).

AI readiness, scored

This table covers the twelve hand-tested platforms. Six criteria on a 0-5 scale. A dash means the criterion wasn't assessed, which is different from a zero. No platform reaches a 5 on any criterion yet.

One test to run on every vendor during a trial: create an objective with three key results, then ask the platform's own AI to summarise it. Across the twelve, four passed a grounded AI task. Atlassian's Rovo found the goal with the right owner, status and dates. Cascade's generated review matched the live plan data with nothing invented. Teamflect's Ask AI produced a summary beginning "it likely focuses on…" and then admitted it couldn't find the goal. OKRs Tool's coach told me the objective had no key results. It had three. On most of the rest, trial limits blocked the test. Ninety seconds, and it separates AI marketing from AI that's wired to your data.

5 questions to ask before you buy OKR software

Each of these came out of the sessions rather than the docs.

1. Do you have to build metrics as separate objects?

Profit.co, Cascade and Atlassian Goals make you create a KPI or metric object before the key result that uses it. Once, that's a form. Across forty teams and four key results each, it's 160 objects by hand before anyone has checked in, and it's a large part of why rollouts stall in week two. A KPI module isn't the problem, Tability has one for ongoing metrics like churn. Making it mandatory is. The same tax shows up in reminders: on Atlassian Goals, OKRs Tool and Teamflect I never found the setting, and Weekdone has one global switch.

Test it: time yourself creating three key results with different units. Over five minutes, multiply by your team count.

2. Is it a platform for conversations, or for listing numbers?

Every platform lets you leave a comment. Almost none treat it as the point. Cascade greys the comment out in history with no way to reply, Perdoo, Mooncamp and Profit.co put the chart first, and Weekdone detaches the comment from the value. Oboard, Teamflect and Atlassian Goals showed me a real thread in the session, and Tability documents one. The extreme case decides your confidence for you: Cascade and Weekdone assign status from the expected line with no override, so a hot start that goes flat stays green until week ten. Let the platform suggest a colour. Let the human set it. OKRs die as a reporting exercise and survive as a conversation.

Test it: post a check-in with a comment, then reply to it as a different user a week later.

3. How fast can you go from tracking to presenting?

Two versions of the question: it's Thursday and the leadership meeting is tomorrow, and separately, how many clicks to answer "how is sales doing". Most platforms answer both with "build a view". Cascade solves Thursday brilliantly with a generated executive review and the everyday case poorly with no standing dashboards. Oboard ships a default dashboard and per-team report for a fraction of the price. OKRs Tool has the most pre-made reporting and several reports that never loaded. Tability and Oboard were the two where I never built a view.

Test it: produce something you'd show leadership. Time it. Then answer "how is team X doing" without search.

4. Can you see what the team is doing, not just the number?

A key result says the number moved, not what anyone did, so it can't say what to do next. Initiative support ranges from serious to cosmetic. Mooncamp's initiatives are a goal type locked to Open/Done, a thin list with no board. Profit.co filed my initiative as a non-contributing key result. Perdoo warns you when a key result is really an initiative, the most common OKR mistake and a guardrail I didn't see elsewhere. Oboard and Atlassian Goals both push work into Jira, one with bulk JQL linking and progress roll-up, the other by making you paste a URL. Tability has a board and a timeline and syncs from four project tools, and doesn't have Perdoo's guardrail or Oboard's Jira-native execution, which is why Oboard scores above it on task support.

Test it: add your initiative, then three weeks later answer "what are we doing about the demos key result" without asking anyone.

5. You can check on a team. Can you check on a person?

Of the ten platforms where I looked, three will show you a person: Perdoo, Tability and Weekdone. The rest show you a team, a filter, or a manager and department with no goals attached. This sounds minor until you think about who opens an OKR tool every week. Managers, whose unit of attention is the five to eight people they're responsible for. A manager who can't pull up a direct report's goals before a 1:1 has no reason to open the tool between check-ins, and a tool managers use once a fortnight is a tool being cancelled.

Test it: pick a name. Can you reach everything they own in two clicks?

Run the test. Shortlist two or three, sign up, and spend thirty minutes each running the scenario from the hand-tested section above. You'll learn more from that than from anything I've written, including the part where my own product ranks first.

If you want to run it on Tability, start a free trial or book a demo. If you disagree with a score, email me. I update this quarterly.

Frequently asked questions

What is the best OKR software in 2026?
‍Tability ranks first of the 23 platforms in this guide (4.5/5), ahead of WorkBoard and Perdoo (both 4.0) and Profit.co (3.5). I tested twelve of them hands-on, and WorkBoard's score comes from documentation. I'm Tability's CEO, so don't take my word for it: the scenario, the scores and the screenshots are all in this guide, and the 30-minute test is easy to rerun on any trial. The right pick still depends on your setup – Oboard if you live in Jira, Teamflect if you live in Microsoft Teams, OKRs Tool if price comes first.

What is the best OKR software for enterprise in 2026?
‍Tability ranks first for enterprise (4.4/5 on the benchmark's enterprise scoring). WorkBoard and Lattice follow on documentation-based scores, then Profit.co (4.3) and Perdoo (4.1), both of which I tested. WorkBoard is the option for services-led rollouts at very large scale – untested here because it has no trial. The full ranking is at tability.io/compare/enterprise.

Why are some platforms reviewed but not tested?
‍WorkBoard, Workpath, Envisio and ClearPoint Strategy don't offer a trial without a sales call, so I couldn't run the shared scenario on them. Seven more are in the benchmark and I haven't run the scenario on them. All eleven are reviewed from public material: websites, pricing pages, help centres, product tours and videos. Each profile ends with the questions to ask in the demo. Any vendor that provides a trial account gets tested hands-on.

Which OKR platforms have an MCP server?
‍Six of the twelve I tested document a vendor-hosted MCP server: Tability, Perdoo, Profit.co, Oboard, OKRs Tool, and Atlassian Goals through Rovo. Rhythms documents MCP client integrations, but I couldn't verify a hosted server. If querying your goals from Claude or ChatGPT is the requirement, test it during the trial – it takes minutes to confirm.

Which OKR software has a free plan?
‍Teamflect is the most generous at 10 users with full functionality. Oboard is free for Jira instances of 10 or fewer, Perdoo and OKRs Tool cover 5 users, Range 12, Weekdone 3, Cascade 2, and Atlassian Goals is included with Atlassian cloud plans. Every seat-capped free plan stops at 12 users or fewer, so treat them as trials rather than a way to run 50 people.

How much does OKR software cost for 100 employees?
‍Listed annual prices at 100 seats run from $1,238 to $31,200 a year, with a median around $9,600. Estimates for vendors that don't publish pricing reach about $36,000. Quote-only enterprise platforms are the exception – observed contracts run $28,205 to $206,502 a year. The per-seat rate is rarely the real bill: minimums, viewer policies and platform prerequisites move costs more than sticker prices. Full breakdowns at nine company sizes are at tability.io/compare/cost.

Is there OKR software that works inside Jira or Microsoft Teams?
‍For Jira: Oboard puts full OKRs inside Jira at $2.16/user/month, and Atlassian Goals is free but shallow.
For Microsoft Teams: Teamflect is Teams-native with performance management included, and Tability runs an embedded Teams experience for check-ins and goal updates. The OKR software for Jira guide compares what each connection can actually do.

Methodology and data

I ran twelve hands-on sessions between 10 and 13 September 2026 and reviewed eleven more platforms from public material in November. Scores and prices come from The OKR Software Benchmark, with the full methodology here. I work for one of the vendors, which is why the scenario, screenshots and limitations are all published.